Skip to main content

Security report for e-celi.lv

SIA Ceļu Inženieri · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CI Grupa is a Latvian company group specializing in transportation infrastructure engineering services, including road and bridge construction supervision, design, GIS development, and bridge inspections. The group consists primarily of SIA Ceļu Inženieri and SIA Teede Insenerid, targeting both public and private sectors in Latvia and Estonia. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and contact information, positioning them as a regional player in the transportation sector. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, along with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, though some libraries are older or alpha versions. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Security configurations lack explicit headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating room for compliance improvements. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no advanced security headers or incident response contacts found. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content, but privacy compliance and security best practices need enhancement. Recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-celi.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CI Grupa operates in the transportation infrastructure sector, providing engineering and consulting services primarily in Latvia and Estonia. Their business model focuses on delivering specialized services such as construction supervision, design, GIS, and planning to both governmental and private clients. The company appears small but professional, with a clear regional focus and a stable service portfolio. The website reflects a consistent brand and provides essential contact details, supporting credibility. However, the lack of detailed company registration data and privacy policies suggests opportunities for strengthening business transparency and compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the two main companies are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and incident readiness to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance site security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts, including a security.txt file if possible.
  4. Update frontend libraries to stable, supported versions to reduce potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or use a registrar that provides transparent registration data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Ceļu Inženieri
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Ceļu Inženieri
Description
CI Grupa is a company group consisting of SIA Ceļu Inženieri and SIA Teede Insenerid, providing services in road and bridge construction supervision, design, GIS creation, bridge inspections, construction project expertise, and various transport infrastructure consulting services.
Key services
road and bridge construction supervision, road and bridge design, geographic information systems (GIS) development, bridge inspections, construction project expertise, territory planning, local and detailed planning, transport development thematic planning, transport infrastructure consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.6, jQuery 3.1.1 slim, Tether 1.4.0, PhotoSwipe 4.1.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via https)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main navigation pages.
  5. Use of modern frontend libraries and frameworks but some are alpha or older versions.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts present indicating user tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. Content is professional and business-focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 4 alpha, jQuery slim, Tether, and PhotoSwipe libraries, indicating a modern but slightly outdated frontend stack. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and professional design. No CMS or hosting details are evident. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features noted. SEO is minimal with empty title and meta description tags, suggesting room for improvement in search visibility. No forms or interactive data collection elements are present on the main pages, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-celi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-celi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.