Skip to main content

Security report for e-car.lv

SIA SOL 1 · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

E-CAR is a Latvian-based car rental company specializing in providing affordable and reliable vehicle rental services primarily in Riga and Riga Airport. The company targets both private individuals and corporate clients, offering a modern online reservation system and additional services such as vehicle delivery, additional drivers, and cross-border rentals within the Baltic and EU/EEA regions. Their market position is that of a growing small business with a strong focus on customer service and compliance with local consumer protection standards. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with integration of Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers are missing. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy, though WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-car.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

E-CAR operates in the transportation sector focusing on car rental services in Latvia, particularly in Riga and the airport area. Their competitive advantage lies in competitive pricing, a user-friendly online booking system, and a customer-centric approach evidenced by numerous positive reviews. The business model includes direct rentals to consumers and corporate clients, with additional revenue from value-added services like airport delivery, additional drivers, and cross-border permissions. The company maintains partnerships and a clear brand identity. Growth indicators include expanding service areas and positive client feedback. The company is registered as SIA SOL 1, with clear legal and tax information displayed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The site uses secure forms with privacy policy consent, indicating awareness of data protection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness. Third-party scripts for analytics and marketing are used, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and incident handling.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing explicit data retention policies and more detailed privacy compliance information.
  5. Consider adding certifications or trust badges to further boost customer confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA SOL 1
Registration number
Reģ.nr. LV 40003582484
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA SOL 1
Description
Piedāvā vienas no zemākajām jaunu automašīnu nomas pakalpojumu cenām Rīgas pilsētā, nodrošinot klientu apkalpošanā korporatīvo sociālās atbildības politiku un labāko praksi patērētāju tiesību jomā saskaņā ar PTAC un Latvijas auto nomu asociācijas ieteikumiem.
Key services
Auto noma Rīgā, Auto noma Rīgas lidostā, Tiešsaistes rezervācija, Papildpakalpojumi (papildus vadītājs, lidostas serviss, izbraukšana ārpus Baltijas)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with privacy policy consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Clear business focus on car rental services in Riga and Riga Airport.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple customer testimonials from Google and Facebook enhance trust.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML but HTTPS is used.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Contact information is consistent and prominently displayed.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. It leverages Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, showing a mature digital marketing setup. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and scripts to improve load times. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless approach. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses SSL/TLS with good configuration but lacks some security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-car.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-car.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.