Dzīvnieku brīvība is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to ending animal suffering in industrial farming, fur farming, and entertainment industries. The website serves as a platform for advocacy, public campaigns, activism mobilization, and fundraising. It targets Latvian-speaking audiences interested in animal rights and welfare. Technically, the site uses modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, with consent mechanisms in place. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention dzivniekubriviba.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dzivniekubriviba.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization positions itself as a leading animal rights NGO in Latvia, running multiple campaigns and engaging the public through petitions, donations, and activism. Its business model relies on donations and memberships, supported by transparent policies and active social media presence. The website links to partner campaign sites and uses third-party marketing and analytics tools. The absence of WHOIS data and physical contact details slightly limits business credibility but the overall content and transparency indicate a legitimate non-profit entity.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS and uses consent-based tracking, reflecting a moderate security maturity. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Improve accessibility features to broaden audience reach and compliance.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Dzīvnieku brīvība
Description
Mēs strādājam, lai izbeigtu dzīvnieku ciešanas industriālajā lopkopībā, kažokzvēru audzēšanā un izklaides industrijā. Dzīvnieki ir pelnījuši cieņpilnu attieksmi un dzīvi bez ciešanām, tāpēc mēs veidojam plašu kustību dzīvnieku aizstāvībai ar mērķi panākt ilgtermiņa sociālās pārmaiņas.
Key services
Animal rights advocacy, Public campaigns, Activism mobilization, Educational materials, Fundraising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, MailerLite (implied from privacy policy)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of consent mechanism for cookies
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a Latvian non-profit animal rights advocacy platform.
Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple campaigns and calls to action.
Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented and detailed.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust assessment.
No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is used.
Multiple external links to partner campaigns and social media.
Use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking with user consent.
No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in HTML.
Contact email info@dzivniekubriviba.lv found in privacy policy text.
No security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks explicit accessibility features and security headers, representing areas for technical improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which is a risk factor for domain legitimacy verification.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dzivniekubriviba.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dzivniekubriviba.lv.