Skip to main content

Security report for dzintars.lv

dzintars · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dzintars.lv is an e-commerce website representing Dzintars, a Latvian cosmetics brand offering a wide range of personal care products including hair care, face care, bath & body, hand care, oral care, perfumes, lip balms, and sun protection. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern and flexible e-commerce platform. The site is well-structured with good navigation, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security is well implemented with HTTPS and multiple security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers, slightly reduce the overall trust and privacy compliance score. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration insights. Overall, the site presents a professional and functional online store for cosmetics products with moderate risk and room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dzintars.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dzintars operates in the retail sector focusing on cosmetics and personal care products, targeting consumers interested in Latvian heritage brands. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with an emphasis on product variety and special offers. The website integrates marketing and tracking tools such as Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Klaviyo, indicating active digital marketing and customer engagement strategies. The lack of visible contact information and formal policies suggests potential gaps in customer support and compliance transparency. The brand appears established with consistent branding and a medium-sized market presence in Latvia.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The presence of cookie consent and GDPR-related consent settings indicates some level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure reduces the overall security maturity. The site would benefit from formalizing these policies and publishing contact channels for security incidents to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
dzintars
Description
Dzintars offers cosmetics products including hair care, face care, bath & body, hand care, oral care, perfumes, lip balms, and sun protection. The brand emphasizes healthy scalp and skin care with Latvian heritage.
Key services
Cosmetics product sales, Online shopping, Special offers and gift sets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Klaviyo
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of secure cookies and consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content or metadata.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and marketing tools including Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Klaviyo.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrant or domain age info extracted.
  7. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a modern CMS and e-commerce platform.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It integrates several third-party marketing and analytics tools, including Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Klaviyo. The site loads scripts asynchronously and defers non-critical JavaScript to improve performance. CSS and JS files are minified and cached, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and structured data are properly implemented. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and formalized compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dzintars.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dzintars.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.