Skip to main content

Security report for dyrket.no

Dyrket.no · Retail · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dyrket.no is an online marketplace focused on delivering local food products from Norwegian farmers and producers directly to consumers. The website positions itself as a niche e-commerce platform catering to customers interested in high-quality, locally sourced food in Norway. The business model revolves around facilitating online orders and home delivery, targeting a general consumer audience within Norway. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure, leveraging Next.js for server-side rendering and React for frontend interactivity, along with integration of Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of security headers and lack of published privacy and terms of service policies represent areas for improvement. The missing WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness, though the website content and technology usage suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good user experience and moderate SEO optimization, but could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dyrket.no

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dyrket.no operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors, specializing in local food distribution within Norway. Its competitive advantage lies in connecting consumers directly with local producers, emphasizing quality and locality. The business model is transactional, generating revenue through sales of food products. The target customer segment includes Norwegian consumers valuing local and sustainable food sources. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators are not available from the provided data. Strategic observations suggest that enhancing transparency through published policies and contact details could improve customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a security gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain transparency, which is a minor trust concern. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration check and update domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dyrket.no
Description
Hos Dyrket.no kan du handle og få levert hjem lokalmat fra flere av Norges beste bønder og produsenter.
Key services
Online ordering, Home delivery of local food products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and Google services for analytics and fonts.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned on the site.
  9. Content is focused on Norwegian local food e-commerce, targeting general consumers.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) which supports server-side rendering and good SEO practices. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are integrated for enhanced UI and location services. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. Performance is moderate with multiple asynchronous scripts loaded. Mobile optimization appears good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dyrket.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dyrket.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.