Skip to main content

Security report for dw-martinsberg.de

Diakoniewerk Martinsberg e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diakoniewerk Martinsberg e.V. is a German non-profit organization focused on providing social and diaconal services to the community. The website serves as an informational platform targeting a general audience interested in social support and community assistance. The organization maintains a moderate market position within the regional non-profit sector, emphasizing human-centric services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard but modern CMS infrastructure with good SEO practices. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and incident response information, exposing potential risks. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but improvements in privacy compliance and security practices are recommended to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dw-martinsberg.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dw-martinsberg.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dw-martinsberg.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, providing social and diaconal services primarily within Germany. Its business model revolves around community support and social welfare, likely funded through donations, grants, or public funding. The website's content and structured data suggest a focus on transparency and outreach, with a Facebook presence to engage stakeholders. The lack of detailed contact information and compliance policies may limit user engagement and trust. There is no indication of commercial activities or partnerships from the provided data. Growth potential may be tied to enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected, which are essential for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of a publicly available privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and incident response information indicates compliance gaps, particularly concerning GDPR and NIS2 regulations applicable in the EU. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency and responsible vulnerability management. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs), but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, the security posture requires significant enhancement to protect user data and organizational reputation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy and a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility, including official emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diakoniewerk Martinsberg e.V.
Description
Menschlich für Menschen
Key services
social services, diaconal support, community assistance
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, jQuery
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Social media presence limited to Facebook link in structured data.
  5. No security or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. Website content is in German and targets a general audience interested in social and diaconal services.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin with structured data and meta tags.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with a popular theme (Divi) and SEO plugin (Yoast), indicating a standard and maintainable technical infrastructure. The site loads moderate CSS and JS assets, including jQuery and accessibility toolbar styles, suggesting some attention to accessibility. Hosting is provided via rzone.de, a German hosting provider, which aligns with the organization's location. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive CSS rules. However, the site lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance features, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities. Addressing these gaps will reduce operational risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dw-martinsberg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dw-martinsberg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.