Skip to main content

Security report for dvojkasrdcem.cz

Nadační fond Dvojka srdcem · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadační fond Dvojka srdcem is a Czech non-profit foundation focused on providing social and financial assistance to residents of Prague 2, particularly families and individuals in need. The foundation offers support such as financial contributions for school supplies, extracurricular activities, and aid for individuals with health challenges. The website presents beneficiary stories and donation progress, reinforcing transparency and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is provided by a Czech hosting provider, aligning with the foundation's local focus. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, though improvements in privacy compliance and security headers are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dvojkasrdcem.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dvojkasrdcem.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dvojkasrdcem.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector with a clear local market position serving Prague 2. Its business model relies on donations and community support, targeting low-income families and individuals requiring social aid. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on transparency and trust-building through detailed beneficiary stories and donation tracking. The foundation leverages standard WordPress infrastructure and common plugins, indicating moderate digital maturity. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided. Growth indicators include recent news about new programs and successful aid distribution. The foundation maintains a Facebook presence to engage with the community.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of reputable WordPress plugins like Contact Form 7 suggests secure form handling. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is critical under GDPR. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page and link it prominently on the website.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to improve security posture.
  4. Develop and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadační fond Dvojka srdcem
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond Dvojka srdcem
Description
Pomáháme společně změnit život lidem z Prahy 2, kteří potřebují pomoc.
Key services
Financial contributions for school supplies and extracurricular activities, Support for individuals with health and social needs, Programs for children and families in low-income situations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Contact Form 7 plugin, AddToAny sharing plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Slick slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URLs and external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Contact Form 7 plugin for secure form handling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit foundation site focused on social aid in Prague 2.
  2. Content is well structured with beneficiary stories and donation progress.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses standard WordPress plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and address.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.5.5 as its CMS, with plugins including Contact Form 7 for forms and AddToAny for social sharing. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses jQuery 3.7.1. Hosting is via cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the foundation's location. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communication. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small non-profit website with moderate digital maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dvojkasrdcem.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dvojkasrdcem.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.