Skip to main content

Security report for dux.dk

DUX · Retail · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DUX is a well-established Danish company specializing in luxury beds and furniture, with a heritage dating back to 1926. The website reflects a mature retail business model targeting consumers seeking high-end comfort and design. The brand maintains a consistent and professional online presence with rich content and clear navigation. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, and a cookie consent management system, indicating a moderate to high level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie attributes, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but the overall brand presence and content quality support legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent but lacks a clearly linked privacy policy. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and user-friendly, with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: smtp.levonline.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dux.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DUX operates in the retail sector focusing on premium beds and furniture, leveraging a strong brand legacy. Their business model centers on direct sales through physical stores and online presence, supported by a network of international partner domains. The company targets affluent consumers valuing design and comfort. Their marketing ecosystem includes social media engagement and analytics tracking. The lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for contact forms and controlled communication channels. The company appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with consistent branding and a focus on innovation and sustainability in product offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and secure cookie settings. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but the absence of a published privacy policy and security incident response information reveals compliance gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page linked prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DUX
Description
Nyt niveau af komfort med møbler og senge fra DUX. Kollektionen består af aktuelle og fremtidige designklassikere. DUX - ikonisk design & komfort siden 1926.
Key services
Manufacturing and selling beds, Manufacturing and selling furniture, Providing sleep science and innovation information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, Cookietractor (cookie consent management), Google Fonts, jQuery (custom ready/bind queue), Lazy loading images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie attributes (SameSite=None; Secure; Partitioned)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookietractor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output, indicating possible privacy protection or query failure
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookietractor
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in provided content
  6. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest
  7. Website uses HTTPS with secure cookie attributes
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
  9. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided content
  10. Contact form available under /om-os/kontakt-os
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Azure Application Insights for monitoring, and Cookietractor for cookie consent management. It uses Google Fonts and lazy loading for performance optimization. The CMS appears to be Episerver, a robust enterprise content management system. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing image delivery and reducing third-party script impact. The technical infrastructure supports a professional retail website with scalable capabilities but could benefit from enhanced security headers and clearer hosting provider information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dux.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dux.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.