Skip to main content

Security report for duoauto.lv

SIA DUO AUTO · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA DUO AUTO is a Latvian automotive service company established in 2010, providing a broad range of car servicing and spare parts sales primarily targeting car owners in Riga and surrounding areas. The company positions itself as a professional and reliable local service provider with a focus on customer care and quality workmanship. Their website reflects this with clear contact information, customer testimonials, and a professional design. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as Bootstrap, jQuery, OwlCarousel, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieYes, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA on forms, which are positive indicators. However, it lacks advanced security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a small local business. The absence of WHOIS data and some security best practices suggests areas for improvement. The risk level is moderate with no critical issues detected, but enhancing security headers and publishing incident response information would strengthen their posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching duoauto.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, specifically automotive servicing and parts retail. Its market position is that of a small, established local service provider with over a decade of experience. The business model combines service delivery with product sales, targeting individual car owners and possibly small fleets. The website content and social media presence (limited to Facebook) suggest a focus on local customer engagement. The partnership with Trinity (website developer) indicates professional support for digital presence. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the consistent branding and service offerings imply stable operations. No subsidiaries or parent companies are identified.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which protect data in transit and reduce spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is addressed via privacy and cookie policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security culture appears basic but functional, suitable for a small business. Improvements in security headers, incident response readiness, and regular updates are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search rankings.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA DUO AUTO
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA DUO AUTO
Description
SIA DUO AUTO is an automotive service company founded in 2010, offering a wide range of car service and spare parts sales. They emphasize professional expertise and customer care.
Key services
Car servicing, Spare parts sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Bootstrap, jQuery, OwlCarousel, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  10. Website performance and mobile optimization are adequate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, OwlCarousel for sliders, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, indicating GDPR awareness. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized, though accessibility features are basic. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The site uses standard SEO meta tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD for enhanced search visibility. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by updating and hardening security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with duoauto.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review duoauto.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.