Skip to main content

Security report for duntes.lv

EfTEN Capital · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EfTEN Capital is a Latvian-based real estate investment company managing multiple real estate funds and a diverse portfolio of commercial and residential properties primarily in the Baltic region. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting investors and commercial tenants, offering detailed information about their funds, portfolio, and news updates. The company appears to be well-established with a large portfolio and multiple funds under management. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Flickity carousel, and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a moderate to good level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers, published security policies, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, but could improve security transparency and WHOIS availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching duntes.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EfTEN Capital operates in the real estate investment sector with a focus on the Baltic market. Their business model centers on managing closed-end real estate funds and leasing commercial and residential properties. The website highlights multiple funds and a large portfolio of properties, indicating a mature market position. The target audience includes investors seeking real estate investment opportunities and tenants looking for commercial spaces. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and cookie consent to engage users and comply with GDPR. No direct social media presence was detected, suggesting a focus on direct investor relations and corporate communications. The absence of WHOIS data limits external verification but the website content and domain name align with a legitimate business entity. No partnerships or subsidiaries were explicitly identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating baseline security and privacy compliance. However, no security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries but does not indicate advanced security frameworks or certifications. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and up to date to improve domain registration transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EfTEN Capital
Description
EfTEN Capital is a real estate investment company managing multiple real estate funds and properties primarily in the Baltic region.
Key services
Real estate fund management, Property leasing, Investment opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Flickity carousel, Parsley.js, CookieScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
CookieScript
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page linked directly but found via URL pattern.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No social media links detected in provided HTML.
  9. Multiple real estate funds and portfolio properties are listed.
  10. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Flickity carousel for portfolio display, Parsley.js for form validation, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The presence of CookieScript indicates compliance with cookie consent regulations. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation menus and accessible design elements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for Google Fonts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content. The site structure and meta tags support good SEO practices. Technical risks include lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with duntes.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review duntes.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.