Skip to main content

Security report for dunense.com

Dunense · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dunense is a Latvian-based small business specializing in the retail of high-quality natural leather accessories including belts, wallets, bracelets, bags, and portfolios. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, targeting primarily Latvian-speaking customers with an English language option. The company maintains a clear online presence with social media links and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the website content and contact information support a legitimate business operation. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional e-commerce platform for leather goods.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dunense.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dunense operates in the niche retail sector of leather accessories within Latvia, leveraging e-commerce to reach its target audience. The business model focuses on direct online sales of handcrafted or quality leather products for both men and women. The company appears to have a stable market position with a clear brand identity and consistent content quality. Revenue streams are primarily product sales through the website. The presence of social media accounts and GDPR-compliant policies indicates awareness of digital marketing and regulatory requirements. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small business. The company’s growth potential lies in expanding product lines and possibly increasing international reach via the English site version.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture for a small e-commerce business. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust but may be due to privacy protection or technical issues. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  3. Add a public security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing, especially focusing on WooCommerce and payment processing components.
  5. Monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools for privacy compliance and security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dunense
Description
DUNENSE piedāvā kvalitatīvus dabīgās ādas aksesuārus. Ādas jostas, maki, rokassprādzes, somas, portfeļi. Aksesuāri gan sievietēm, gan vīriešiem.
Key services
Sale of leather belts, Sale of wallets, Sale of bracelets, Sale of bags, Sale of portfolios
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Select2
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce site selling leather accessories.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English alternate language available.
  3. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor builder.
  4. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR.
  5. No signs of malware or phishing detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which reduces trust score.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter.
  9. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It uses common web technologies including jQuery and Select2 for enhanced UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a valid SSL certificate. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident such as font preloading and image responsive techniques. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and adaptive layouts. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small e-commerce business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dunense.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dunense.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.