Skip to main content

Security report for drosibas-plombas.lv

Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website drosibas-plombas.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in the supply of security seals, including plastic and metal seals, security labels, and security bags primarily for logistics, measurement devices, and storage sectors. The business emphasizes certified European quality products and targets B2B customers requiring secure sealing solutions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, though mobile optimization is basic. Technically, the site uses several JavaScript libraries including outdated jQuery versions and integrates Google Analytics and Smartsupp live chat for user engagement and tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks advanced security headers and uses outdated libraries, presenting potential vulnerabilities. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drosibas-plombas.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and logistics sector, providing essential security sealing products that comply with European standards. Its market position is that of a specialized supplier with a focus on quality and certification. The business model is B2B, serving clients needing secure seals for cargo, containers, and measurement devices. The presence of related partner domains suggests a networked ecosystem in security and automation products. Revenue streams likely come from product sales and customization services. The website content and contact information support a credible business presence, though lack of detailed company registration data limits deeper insights.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but relies on outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.9.1) that may have known vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, reducing protection against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no data protection officer or GDPR compliance statements are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. The business should prioritize updating libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve its security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to supported secure versions.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Drošības plombas loģistikai, mērierīcēm un glabāšanai. Iespējama personalizācija. Piedāvā plašu klāstu plastmasas un metāla plombas, drošības uzlīmes, somas un maisiņus.
Key services
Plastic seals, Metal seals, Security labels, Security bags and pouches, Other security materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery Migrate 1.0.0, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Smartsupp Live Chat, Lightslider, Fancybox, Camera.js, Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smartsupp Live Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  5. Website uses several JavaScript libraries including outdated jQuery version.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Google+ (though Google+ is deprecated).
  8. Business focuses on security seals for logistics, measurement devices, and storage.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery Migrate, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and Google Analytics. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework indication and appears custom-built or lightly templated. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The site does not implement advanced SEO or structured data beyond basic meta tags. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers, which pose risks to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drosibas-plombas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drosibas-plombas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.