Skip to main content

Security report for driveeo.com

Drive eO · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Drive eO is a specialized engineering and consulting company focused on the design and manufacture of prototype electric and hybrid vehicles, particularly in the high-performance and racing sectors. Their services include integration of electric drive systems, motor controllers, custom battery packs, and supervisory controllers. The company targets electric vehicle enthusiasts, racing teams, and prototype developers, positioning itself as a niche provider in sustainable transportation technology. The website reflects a small but professional operation with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO tools like Yoast and integrates social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and HTTPS security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are missing, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. Analytics usage is moderate with Google Analytics tracking but lacks clear privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, as well as incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business history and shows no suspicious patterns, supporting the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and secure at a basic level but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around data protection and incident response to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching driveeo.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Drive eO operates in the specialized market of electric race car design and engineering, serving a niche segment focused on high-performance low-carbon vehicles. Their competitive advantage lies in bespoke engineering solutions and prototype manufacturing capabilities. The business model centers on consulting and custom product development, targeting automotive teams and electric vehicle innovators. The company demonstrates growth through participation in international events like Pikes Peak and Dakar, and engagement with EU-funded research projects. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media engagement and collaboration with investment agencies. Revenue streams likely derive from engineering services, consulting, and custom component sales. The company maintains a small size with a focused market presence and consistent branding, positioning it as a trusted expert in its domain.

Security posture

The security maturity of Drive eO's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration protections are in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates gaps in security best practices and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and social media integrations introduces moderate tracking but lacks clear user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site does not exhibit critical vulnerabilities but should enhance its security posture by adopting recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies to align with GDPR and industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Drive eO
Description
Design and manufacture of prototype electric vehicles; Integration of electric drive systems; Electric Vehicle master controllers; ICE electronic controllers; Custom EV battery packs
Key services
Design and manufacture of prototype electric & hybrid vehicles, Integration of electric drive systems, Electric motor controllers, Custom battery packs, Supervisory controllers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with Yoast SEO plugin for search optimization. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, contributing to fast loading times and good performance. The site integrates social media widgets from Twitter and Facebook and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The technical infrastructure is modern and stable, but some security enhancements and privacy compliance improvements are recommended to reduce technical risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with driveeo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review driveeo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.