Skip to main content

Security report for drift.com

Salesloft · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Salesloft operates a comprehensive sales engagement platform targeting enterprise sales and revenue teams. The website showcases multiple integrated products such as Cadence, Rhythm, Conversations, Drift, Deals, Analytics, and Forecast, positioning Salesloft as a mature player in the sales technology market. The platform emphasizes pipeline management, sales action automation, visitor engagement, and data-driven insights. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with integrations for marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, and Marketo. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and consent management, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which raises some trust concerns despite the professional presentation. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of drift.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drift.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Salesloft targets enterprise clients in the technology sector, offering SaaS solutions for sales engagement and revenue workflow optimization. Their business model revolves around subscription-based access to a suite of sales tools integrated into a unified platform. The company leverages partnerships, notably with Drift, to enhance visitor engagement capabilities. The website content and structure indicate a focus on pipeline management, sales cadence automation, and analytics-driven decision making. The presence of an integrations marketplace and AI-focused offerings suggests a strategy to expand ecosystem connectivity and innovation. The lack of visible company registration or contact details on the site is a minor gap in business transparency. The company appears positioned as a leader in sales technology with a broad product portfolio and enterprise-scale reach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs multiple tracking and consent management technologies, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for enterprise trust and compliance. The missing WHOIS data adds a layer of uncertainty regarding domain ownership transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting best practices in security headers, policy publication, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Salesloft
Description
Salesloft is a technology company providing a sales engagement platform that helps businesses build and nurture sales pipelines, take the right sales actions, engage website visitors, manage and close sales opportunities, and turn data into actionable insights.
Key services
Cadence automation, Sales rhythm management, Conversations analytics, Drift engagement platform, Deals management, Sales forecasting, Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Marketo RTP, Ketch Consent Management
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management scripts (Ketch)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Bing UET, Marketo RTP
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, Marketo RTP
Marketing tools
Marketo, Ketch Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sales engagement platform site with multiple product offerings.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Use of multiple modern tracking and marketing technologies.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing UET, and Marketo RTP for user tracking and campaign management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (FAQ schema) to improve search engine visibility. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or headless architecture. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of images. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and professional digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100 −2Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 76/100 +2Low26 findingsView report
  3. 74/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drift.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drift.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.