Skip to main content

Security report for dpd.sk

DPD · Transportation · Slovakia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPD Slovakia operates as a key player in the parcel delivery and logistics sector, providing comprehensive domestic and international courier services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear branding, multilingual support, and customer-centric features such as parcel tracking and pickup locations. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and includes integrations for analytics and cookie consent, indicating a well-maintained platform. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and some security best practices, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response documentation. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting a large-scale logistics business. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is likely due to querying a subdomain or privacy protection, but does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dpd.sk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dpd.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
159
Employees
5
Customers
150
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
14%

Latest record dated 2025-07-25 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for dpd.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfproxy.dpd.sk2025-07-25
  • –.dpd.sk2025-07-20
  • –adfproxy.dpd.sk2025-07-20
  • –adfproxy.dpd.sk2025-07-02
  • –adfproxy.dpd.sk2025-06-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DPD Slovakia is positioned as a leading logistics provider within the DPD/Geopost group, targeting both individual consumers and business clients including e-shops. Their business model focuses on parcel delivery services with value-added features such as guaranteed delivery times and self-service pickup points. The website's content and structure support a broad customer base with clear navigation to services, support, and career opportunities. The company leverages partnerships within the DPD group and maintains a strong brand presence. Growth indicators include multilingual support and digital tools for shipment management. The ecosystem includes related domains for service portals and group information, reflecting a cohesive operational network.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and use of security nonces in AJAX calls. Cookie consent is managed via TrustCommander, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, representing an area for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen security culture and transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention and privacy practices to reinforce trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPD
Description
DPD is a courier and parcel delivery service provider offering domestic and international shipping solutions, including guaranteed delivery times, pickup locations, and services tailored for e-shops and business customers.
Key services
Domestic parcel delivery, International parcel delivery, Pickup locations and self-service boxes, Business shipping solutions, Online parcel tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, WordPress, SiteOrigin Panels, Google Tag Manager, TrustCommander (cookie consent), Various DPD custom plugins
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security nonce tokens in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TrustCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with custom DPD plugins and Bootstrap framework.
  3. Strong branding consistent with DPD international group.
  4. Multiple language versions and country-specific sites linked.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or not found in the raw output.
  9. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration.
  10. Google Tag Manager and TrustCommander used for analytics and cookie consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses common libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and TrustCommander for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes structured data for SEO. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-supported, though some accessibility and security header improvements are recommended. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly digital experience aligned with business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dpd.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dpd.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.