Skip to main content

Security report for dpd.lv

DPD · Transportation · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPD Latvija operates as a key parcel delivery and logistics provider in Latvia, serving both private individuals and business clients. The website reflects a mature digital presence with localized content, multiple language support, and integration with the broader DPD group ecosystem. The company offers a range of services including parcel shipping, pickup networks, contactless delivery, and e-commerce logistics solutions, positioning itself as a leading player in the Latvian transportation sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, leveraging custom plugins tailored for DPD's operational needs. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and user experience design. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and TagCommander are implemented with consent mechanisms, indicating attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs secure form handling with nonce tokens. While explicit security headers are not detected, no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy policies and cookie consent banners are present and comprehensive, supporting GDPR compliance. However, incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a strong business credibility score. The missing WHOIS data for the exact subdomain is due to querying a subdomain rather than the main domain, which is well-known and reputable. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response details, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen the security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dpd.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DPD Latvija benefits from being part of the international Geopost group, leveraging a strong brand and extensive logistics network. The business model focuses on parcel delivery services tailored to both consumers and businesses, including e-commerce support. The website's content and service offerings indicate a focus on convenience, digital integration, and sustainability initiatives. The presence of multiple language versions and regional sites suggests a broad market reach within the Baltic region and Europe. The company maintains active customer engagement through contact channels including phone, WhatsApp, and online forms. The digital infrastructure supports growth and operational efficiency, with potential for further expansion in e-commerce logistics and sustainability services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and secure form implementations. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to data protection. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options is a minor gap that could be addressed to enhance defense-in-depth. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were detected. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and readiness communication. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by formalizing incident response processes and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure guidelines to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user inclusivity.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Maintain and communicate clear data retention policies aligned with GDPR requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPD
Description
DPD is a parcel delivery service provider operating in Latvia, offering shipping, receiving, returns, and e-commerce logistics solutions.
Key services
Parcel shipping, Parcel receiving, Pickup network, Predict delivery, Contactless delivery, Business client services, E-commerce logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, WordPress, SiteOrigin Panels, DPD custom plugins
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with AJAX and nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TagCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and localized for Latvia.
  3. Multiple language options and regional subdomains exist.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is available including phone and WhatsApp.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with custom DPD plugins and Bootstrap framework.
  7. Includes tracking and analytics scripts with consent mechanisms.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  9. WHOIS data for the exact subdomain is missing but main domain is known and reputable.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS platform with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, supported by custom DPD plugins for parcel tracking and customer interaction. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and chatbot functionality. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and accessibility improvements. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for optimization in security and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dpd.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dpd.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.