Skip to main content

Security report for dpd.lt

DPD · Transportation · Lithuania

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPD Lithuania operates as a parcel delivery and courier service provider, serving both business and private customers. It is part of the international DPD group under Geopost, offering parcel delivery, parcel locker services, and e-commerce shipping solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and parcel tracking features. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, and integrates consent management and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though public security policies and incident response contacts are not explicitly published. WHOIS data for the main domain is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for large enterprises. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dpd.lt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DPD Lithuania holds a strong market position as a leading parcel delivery service in Lithuania, targeting both businesses and private individuals. Its business model focuses on logistics and courier services with digital self-service options like parcel tracking and online shipment creation. The company benefits from being part of the Geopost group, leveraging international logistics networks. The website reflects a well-established brand with consistent messaging and trust signals such as structured data and privacy compliance. Partnerships with related domains like dpdgroup.com and esiunta.dpd.lt support its service ecosystem. The company appears to invest in digital marketing and user experience, indicating growth orientation and customer-centric operations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. Consent management for cookies is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is managed with consent but should be regularly audited to mitigate risks. Overall, the security maturity is solid for a commercial logistics website but could be enhanced by publishing more explicit security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and consent mechanisms to maintain security and privacy compliance.
  5. Consider providing more detailed business registration and certification information to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPD
Description
DPD is a parcel delivery company providing courier services and parcel delivery to parcel lockers in Lithuania.
Key services
Parcel delivery, Courier services, Parcel locker services, Business shipping solutions, Private shipping solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, WordPress, SiteOrigin Panels, Google Tag Manager, TrustCommander (Consent Management), Alturing Chatbot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TrustCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data for main domain is unavailable, indicating privacy or proxy usage.
  4. Website uses modern technologies and consent management.
  5. Clear business focus on parcel delivery in Lithuania.
  6. Contact information is available but no explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  7. Good SEO and structured data usage.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and SiteOrigin Panels. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and TrustCommander for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses structured data for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, contributing to a secure environment. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and security transparency could be addressed to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dpd.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dpd.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.