Skip to main content

Security report for dpd.ee

DPD · Transportation · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DPD Estonia operates as a key parcel delivery service provider within Estonia and across Europe, under the larger Geopost group umbrella. The company offers comprehensive parcel sending, receiving, and tracking services tailored for both business and private customers. Their digital presence is well-established with a modern WordPress-based website featuring multilingual support and customer self-service portals such as myDPD. The website demonstrates good technical maturity with responsive design, modern frameworks, and integration of marketing and analytics tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data for the main domain suggests privacy protection or proxy usage, which slightly impacts transparency but is common for large enterprises. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dpd.ee

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DPD Estonia holds a strong market position as a leading parcel delivery service in the region, leveraging the extensive Geopost network. Their business model focuses on logistics and transportation services with a strong emphasis on e-commerce integration and customer convenience. The company targets both B2B and B2C segments, offering tailored solutions such as business contracts and e-shop shipping. Partnerships with related domains like dpdgroup.com and telli.dpd.ee enhance their service ecosystem. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital strategy aimed at customer engagement and operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and standard security headers, indicating a baseline secure environment. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies align with GDPR compliance. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure channels suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts and analytics is managed with consent, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in dependencies is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS data or clarifying domain registration details to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DPD
Description
DPD is a parcel delivery service operating across Europe, offering solutions for businesses and private individuals including parcel sending, receiving, and tracking.
Key services
Parcel sending, Parcel receiving, Parcel tracking (myDPD), International shipping, Business solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, WordPress, SiteOrigin Panels, Various DPD custom plugins
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TagCommander
Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TagCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with language alternatives available.
  3. Strong branding consistent with DPD and Geopost group.
  4. Multiple customer service and business contact points available.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly.
  8. WHOIS data for the main domain is unavailable, indicating privacy or proxy usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, ensuring responsive and modern UI/UX. Integration of FontAwesome icons and various DPD custom plugins supports rich functionality. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially on mobile devices. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website schema. The site uses Google Tag Manager and TagCommander for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dpd.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dpd.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.