Skip to main content

Security report for douglas.eu

Douglas · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Douglas operates a large-scale e-commerce platform specializing in beauty and personal care products, primarily targeting the German market. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging JavaScript frameworks and third-party services such as Instana for performance monitoring and Forter for fraud prevention. While the platform shows good design quality and user experience, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and some security best practices, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate room for improvement. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting the legitimacy of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching douglas.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Douglas holds a strong market position as a leading beauty retailer in Germany, focusing on online retail through its website and mobile app. The business model centers on direct-to-consumer sales of beauty products. The company targets consumers interested in personal care and beauty, leveraging digital marketing and performance monitoring tools. The absence of explicit contact information and compliance documents in the analyzed content suggests potential gaps in customer engagement and regulatory adherence. The technology stack indicates a commitment to modern web standards and user experience optimization.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates fraud prevention and performance monitoring services, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of visible security headers, absence of a published security policy, and no incident response contact details reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and enhancing privacy compliance documentation to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Douglas
Description
Douglas is a retail company specializing in beauty and personal care products, operating an e-commerce platform targeting consumers primarily in Germany.
Key services
Online retail of beauty and personal care products, Mobile app for shopping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by chunked CSS and JS files), Instana (performance monitoring), Kameleoon (A/B testing), Forter (fraud prevention)
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Use of third-party fraud prevention (Forter)
  • Use of performance monitoring (Instana)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Instana
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Forter, Instana, Kameleoon
Marketing tools
Kameleoon
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for beauty products in Germany.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and third-party services for performance and fraud prevention.
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  7. No data protection officer contact information found.
  8. No certifications or trust badges explicitly found in the content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework likely React, with chunked CSS and JS files indicating modular design. Third-party integrations include Instana for monitoring, Forter for fraud prevention, and Kameleoon for A/B testing. Hosting details are limited but DNS is managed via netnames.net name servers, suggesting professional domain management. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization considered good. SEO and meta tags are adequately implemented, but accessibility could be improved. No CMS was explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and user-friendly e-commerce platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with douglas.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review douglas.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.