Skip to main content

Security report for dorik.com

Dorik, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dorik, Inc. operates an AI-powered website building platform designed to enable users without design or coding experience to create professional websites quickly and affordably. The company targets individuals and small to medium businesses seeking easy-to-use website creation tools. Their market position emphasizes affordability and user-friendliness, supported by advanced AI and SEO features. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring good SSL configuration and domain security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement in security hardening. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms, which could expose the company to regulatory risks. The security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dorik.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dorik.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dorik operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider of website building solutions. Their business model relies on subscription or freemium access to AI-enhanced website creation tools. The company was founded in 2020 and leverages partnerships with affiliate marketing platforms such as Partnero and FirstPromoter to drive growth. Their digital presence is supported by extensive analytics and marketing integrations, indicating a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy documentation suggests a focus on product over formal compliance communications. The domain age predates the company founding, suggesting domain reuse but no evident legitimacy concerns. The company maintains consistent branding and a clear value proposition aimed at non-technical users.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS with clientTransferProhibited domain status, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data. There is no published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response email addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dorik, Inc.
Description
Dorik is an all-in-one website-building platform that makes it easy for anyone to create a beautiful website in minutes without any design or coding experience. Dorik is flexible, easy-to-use, and one of the most affordable website building platforms.
Key services
AI Website Builder, User-friendly design tools, Business solutions, SEO features
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, ProfitWell, Microsoft Clarity, YouTube iframe API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, ProfitWell, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Domain is registered with Cloudflare and uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No WAF blocking or challenge detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with integrations for multiple analytics and marketing platforms including Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot, and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing robust SSL/TLS support and DNS management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses custom fonts and CSS variables for consistent branding. No known CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize page load times. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates areas for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dorik.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dorik.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.