Skip to main content

Security report for dopravce-brno.cz

Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dopravce-brno.cz operates as a spediční agentura (freight forwarding agency) specializing in providing reliable and cost-effective cargo transportation services primarily in the Brno region of the Czech Republic. It offers free price calculation tools for transport costs per kilometer and emphasizes professional and trustworthy logistics solutions. The business targets companies and entrepreneurs seeking efficient freight and forwarding services. The domain was registered recently in early 2024, consistent with the business's apparent founding year, indicating a new market entrant. The website is built using Bootstrap and custom JavaScript for cookie consent management, providing a responsive and user-friendly interface with a detailed contact form for service inquiries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dopravce-brno.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized transportation and forwarding service provider with a focus on competitive pricing and customer reliability. Its business model revolves around acting as an intermediary between clients and transport providers, offering free cost estimations and facilitating logistics. The website links to several related domains in the transportation and travel sectors, suggesting a partnership ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may indicate a preference for initial contact via the web form. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a localized market focus. The content quality and professional presentation support moderate trustworthiness, although the lack of explicit privacy and security policies limits credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS (assumed from URL) and includes a cookie consent mechanism with granular categories, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy page was found, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which reduces the overall security posture. The contact form includes validation but lacks visible anti-bot or advanced security features. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, with no privacy protection masking registrant data. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company email and phone number to improve trust and accessibility.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Spediční agentura specializující se na nákladní dopravu, nabízí kalkulaci ceny dopravy zdarma a výhodné ceny za kilometr. Poskytuje spolehlivé autodopravní služby a spediční služby.
Key services
nákladní autodoprava, spediční služby, kalkulace ceny dopravy zdarma
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, JavaScript, CookieConsent.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • cookie consent with granular categories
  • form validation with feedback

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TOPlist
Tracking pixels
TOPlist
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a detailed contact form for service inquiries.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found, but terms of service page exists.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Website content is in Czech language targeting local businesses.
  6. Multiple external links to related transportation and travel domains.
  7. No social media links or business certifications displayed.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Website uses Bootstrap framework and custom cookie consent scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern responsive framework (Bootstrap) and includes custom JavaScript for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The HTML structure is valid with proper form validation and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate with external dependencies on CDN-hosted CSS and JavaScript. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with relevant meta tags and keywords. However, the lack of detected security headers and absence of CMS or hosting provider information suggest areas for technical improvement. The site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer business identity elements such as logos and direct contact details.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dopravce-brno.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dopravce-brno.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.