Skip to main content

Security report for door-rlp.info

Arbeit und Leben gGmbH · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DOOR is a German non-profit project operated by Arbeit und Leben gGmbH, focused on providing volunteer interpreting services in social contexts such as medical, educational, and public service environments. The project is government funded and aims to facilitate communication for people with different languages by offering qualified volunteer interpreters. The website is hosted on WordPress.com and uses standard WordPress technologies and plugins. It is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information but lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing security headers. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for such non-profit projects. Overall, the website is trustworthy and serves its intended audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching door-rlp.info

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention door-rlp.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for door-rlp.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project occupies a niche in the non-profit sector, providing social interpreting services funded by a regional government ministry. Its business model relies on volunteer engagement and government support. The website content is professional and consistent with the mission. The target audience includes both clients needing interpreting and volunteers. The project benefits from trust signals such as government funding and clear contact channels. The hosting on WordPress.com suggests a cost-effective digital presence. There are no indications of commercial revenue streams or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arbeit und Leben gGmbH
Description
DOOR is a project by Arbeit und Leben gGmbH aiming to provide and qualify volunteer interpreters to facilitate communication in social contexts. It is funded by the Rhineland-Palatinate Ministry for Family, Women, Culture and Integration. The project focuses on interpreting in social settings such as medical, counseling, childcare, schools, and public offices but excludes legal or police interpreting.
Key services
Volunteer interpreter mediation, Interpreter qualification and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Google Fonts, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
wordpress.com stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
wordpress.com
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and focused on social interpreting services.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD not supported and privacy protection.
  5. Website uses WordPress.com hosting and standard plugins.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress hosted on WordPress.com, using Jetpack and Google Fonts. It loads scripts asynchronously and uses modern font loading techniques. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile responsive and has basic SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The technical stack is appropriate for a small non-profit project but could benefit from additional security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with door-rlp.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review door-rlp.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.