Skip to main content

Security report for domusgrupa.lv

SIA Domus Grupa · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domus Grupa is a Latvian small business specializing in the retail of building materials and providing construction consultations, with over 20 years of experience serving the Rēzekne region. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting local construction professionals and consumers. The business model focuses on direct sales and advisory services, supported by a physical store and delivery options. Technically, the site is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), there is a lack of visible security headers and no privacy policy or terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and trust. The cookie consent banner indicates some privacy awareness. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domusgrupa.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Domus Grupa holds a stable position as a local building materials retailer with a long-standing presence in the Latvian market. Its competitive advantage lies in its 20 years of experience and personalized consultation services. The business targets construction professionals and general consumers in the Rēzekne area, relying on direct sales and delivery. The website supports brand visibility and customer engagement but lacks advanced digital marketing or e-commerce features. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with only a Facebook presence noted. Growth opportunities include expanding online presence, adding e-commerce capabilities, and improving compliance and security transparency to build greater customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled but no explicit security headers detected in the HTML content. The presence of a cookie consent banner is positive for privacy compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no advanced security controls or certifications are evident. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and terms policies, and establish incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve technical quality and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Domus Grupa
Registration number
42403008936
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Domus Grupa
Description
Domus Grupa is a building materials store with over 20 years of experience in sales and consultation in construction matters, providing free consultations and selling construction and finishing materials in Rēzekne city.
Key services
Building materials sales, Consultations on construction, Delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Tag Manager, Tilda CMS, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Frameworks
Tilda Blocks
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  3. Site uses Tilda CMS platform with standard Tilda blocks and scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found or linked.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  9. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. No JSON-LD structured data or schema.org markup found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, using jQuery 1.10.2 and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and static assets from Tilda CDN. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses standard CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with no evident heavy scripts or slow-loading elements. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations beyond basic meta tags. There is no structured data (JSON-LD) present. The absence of security headers and unknown SSL configuration represent technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small retail business but could be improved for security, compliance, and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domusgrupa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domusgrupa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.