Skip to main content

Security report for dometicgroup.com

Dometic Group AB (publ) · Transportation · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dometic Group AB (publ) operates as a global leader in manufacturing and distributing innovative products for land vehicles, boats, outdoor markets, and professional/residential applications. The company serves consumers in over 100 countries through a combination of direct sales and a worldwide distribution network. Their strong brand portfolio and commitment to enhancing mobility and comfort position them as a significant player in the transportation sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks, Episerver CMS, and cloud hosting on Microsoft Azure, supported by analytics and error monitoring tools such as Google Tag Manager and Raygun. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though explicit security headers and incident response policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. However, the WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and explicit security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dometicgroup.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dometic Group's market positioning as a global leader in transportation-related products is supported by their extensive geographic reach and diversified product portfolio. Their business model combines manufacturing with direct and indirect sales channels, targeting both consumer and professional markets. The company demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability and investor relations, as evidenced by dedicated sections and reports on their website. The presence of a career portal indicates ongoing growth and talent acquisition efforts. Their partnership ecosystem includes official career and brand websites, reinforcing brand consistency. The company appears to maintain a robust digital marketing and analytics infrastructure, enabling data-driven decision-making and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security monitoring tools like Raygun. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data introduces a risk factor regarding domain ownership legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security governance information and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly document comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Clarify domain registration details to improve transparency and trustworthiness, resolving the missing WHOIS data issue.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dometic Group AB (publ)
Description
Dometic is a global leader in creating innovative and outstanding products for installation in land vehicles and boats, standalone products for the outdoor market and solutions for residential, and professional applications. Operating through a combination of own sales organizations and a worldwide distribution and service network, they reach consumers in over 100 countries. They have a strong brand portfolio committed to creating versatile solutions that enhance mobility and comfort globally.
Key services
Product manufacturing, Sales and distribution, Customer service and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Raygun (error monitoring)
Frameworks
Episerver/Optimizely CMS
Platforms
Microsoft Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security monitoring (Raygun)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Raygun
Marketing tools
Raygun
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured navigation.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Episerver/Optimizely).
  4. No visible security issues or exposed sensitive data.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Contact information is available via contact pages but no direct emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  8. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React-based JavaScript, Episerver/Optimizely CMS, and hosted on Microsoft Azure. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Raygun for error monitoring, indicating a focus on performance and reliability. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of critical assets. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for a large enterprise. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and further optimize performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dometicgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dometicgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.