Skip to main content

Security report for doarchitects.lt

DO architects · Real Estate · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DO architects is a small, established architectural firm based in Vilnius, Lithuania, specializing in architecture, urban planning, and interior design. The company targets innovative clients seeking transformative projects in cities, houses, and landscapes. Their website showcases a comprehensive portfolio of projects and maintains an active social media presence, reinforcing their market position. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrated analytics tools. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate; while no critical vulnerabilities were found, the absence of security headers and explicit HTTPS confirmation are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but no dedicated privacy or terms of service pages. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification, but the website content and branding suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and business credibility but should enhance security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching doarchitects.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, providing architectural and urban planning services primarily in Lithuania with some international projects. Their business model is service-based, focusing on design and consulting. The firm demonstrates strong branding consistency and professionalism, supported by a rich project portfolio and social media engagement. Revenue streams likely derive from architectural contracts and consulting engagements. The target customer segment includes innovative clients and developers seeking impactful architectural solutions. Growth indicators include recent project updates and active social media channels. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and document sharing via Issuu. Strategic observations suggest the firm could benefit from enhanced digital trust signals such as privacy policies and security certifications to strengthen client confidence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. Key strengths include the absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of reputable hosting and CMS platforms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms are present that collect sensitive user data, minimizing risk exposure. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for GDPR and other regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear as no dedicated security contact channels are provided. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in implementing best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration across the website.
  4. Establish dedicated incident response contact channels for security reporting.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and update technical infrastructure to maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DO architects
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DO architects
Description
DO architects works with successful and innovative clients. Together we achieve significant and lasting transformations of cities, houses and landscapes. We create architecture that attracts attention, makes influence and determines success.
Key services
Architecture design, Urban planning, Interior design, Rehabilitation and revitalization projects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, YUI JavaScript Library, Squarespace proprietary scripts
Frameworks
Squarespace
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and project portfolio
  2. No forms detected on main pages; contact via email only
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie policy is implemented with consent mechanism
  5. Social media accounts are linked and active
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. No security headers detected in HTML source
  8. HTTPS usage not explicitly confirmed in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its proprietary scripts and YUI JavaScript library. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of CDN-hosted assets and image-heavy project portfolios. Accessibility is basic, with potential improvements in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Technical debt appears low due to the managed platform, but reliance on third-party scripts requires monitoring for vulnerabilities. Modernization opportunities include adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing accessibility features to broaden user reach and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with doarchitects.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review doarchitects.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.