Skip to main content

Security report for dlm.lv

DLM Interior · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DLM Interior is a Latvian-based small interior design company specializing in comprehensive interior design services including design projects, 3D visualization, interior completion, author supervision, and decoration. Their market focus is primarily residential and commercial clients in Riga and surrounding areas. The website presents a professional portfolio and clear service offerings, positioning them as a credible local design studio. Technically, the website uses a moderately modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content quality. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and performance optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website footer indicates the business has been active since 2010, supporting legitimacy. Contact information is primarily via WhatsApp and a contact page link, with no direct email addresses found. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security headers, and clearer contact channels to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dlm.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DLM Interior operates in the interior design sector within Latvia, targeting residential and commercial clients seeking turnkey interior solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a full suite of design services from conceptualization to execution supervision, supported by a portfolio showcasing diverse projects. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely generated from design contracts and consulting. The company maintains an active social media presence to engage clients and build brand awareness. Growth indicators include a well-maintained portfolio and consistent branding. Partnerships appear limited to website development (lappuse.lv). Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital presence and formalizing compliance documentation to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect user interactions. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. Lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. To improve, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, formalize privacy and cookie policies, and establish incident response contacts to enhance security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a company email address and security incident response contacts.
  4. Conduct a security audit to verify SSL/TLS configuration strength and update any outdated libraries or frameworks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and optimize website performance for better user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DLM Interior
Description
DLM Interior offers interior design services including design projects, 3D visualization, interior completion, work execution order, author supervision, and decoration primarily in Riga and Latvia.
Key services
Dizaina projekts, 3D vizualizācija, Interjera komplektācija, Darbu izpildes kārtība, Autoruzraudzība, Dekorēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.2, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Jura), Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for an interior design business.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Uses common and reputable third-party services for analytics and UI.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture could be improved.
  6. Contact information is primarily via WhatsApp and contact page link; no explicit email addresses found.
  7. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  8. No explicit GDPR compliance indicators present.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a traditional web stack with jQuery 1.11.2 and Bootstrap 3.3.4, which are somewhat dated but still widely supported. Font Awesome 4.7.0 and Google Fonts are used for UI styling. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for traffic analysis. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, the use of older jQuery and Bootstrap versions may pose security and maintenance risks. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The site lacks modern frontend frameworks or progressive web app features, indicating room for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dlm.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dlm.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.