Skip to main content

Security report for dlapiper.dk

Dla piper denmark · Law practice · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dlapiper.dk

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DLA Piper holds a leading market position in the Nordic legal services sector, with a pan-Nordic presence through multiple regional offices. The business model centers on providing cross-border legal consultancy to corporate clients. The website supports this by linking to sister sites in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and the Nordic group. The firm leverages partnerships with major platforms like LinkedIn and Vimeo for marketing and content delivery. The absence of direct contact details on the main page suggests a focus on client confidentiality and possibly directing inquiries through other channels. The cookie consent and analytics setup indicate a commitment to compliance and data-driven insights.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner with granular controls, including necessary, preferences, statistics, and marketing cookies. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, enhancing GDPR compliance. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed in the provided content. The site would benefit from publishing clear privacy and security policies and implementing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Provide clear contact information for data protection officer or privacy inquiries to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party cookies and tracking to ensure ongoing compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DLA Piper
Description
DLA Piper is the leading business law firm in the Nordic region, and the only law firm with a truly pan-Nordic presence. With five offices located in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, we are able to provide consistent and efficient services locally and across borders.
Key services
Business law advisory, Legal consultancy, Cross-border legal services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Typekit fonts, Cloudflare (implied by cookies)
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • IP anonymization in analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Monsido, Mapbox
Marketing tools
LinkedIn marketing cookies
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a localized Danish subsite of a global law firm.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses Drupal 10 CMS and modern web technologies.
  6. Google Analytics configured with IP anonymization for GDPR compliance.
  7. No WAF or security blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to subdomain status; no registrar info found.
  9. External links mostly to trusted partners and service providers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dlapiper.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dlapiper.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.