Skip to main content

Security report for dkveikals.lv

Daiļrade koks · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daiļrade koks is a Latvian small business specializing in the retail and distribution of furniture fittings, tools, and related hardware products. The website targets local customers and businesses seeking furniture accessories and operates primarily as an e-commerce platform with product catalogs and ordering capabilities. The company maintains partnerships with several European manufacturers, as evidenced by the partner logos displayed on the site. Technically, the website employs legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.5 and jQuery UI 1.8.2, along with plugins like Fancybox and jCarouselLite. The site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries introduces potential vulnerabilities. No cookie consent mechanism or comprehensive privacy compliance features are present, though a privacy policy page exists. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with moderate trustworthiness. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment, but the business appears legitimate based on content and partner affiliations. Security posture and privacy compliance require improvement to reduce risk and enhance customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dkveikals.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Daiļrade koks operates in the retail and manufacturing sector focused on furniture fittings and tools. Its market position is that of a niche regional supplier serving Latvian customers with a business model centered on e-commerce and wholesale distribution. The company leverages partnerships with established European manufacturers to offer a diverse product range. Revenue streams likely derive from direct product sales. The target customer segments include both retail consumers and business clients in Latvia. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known hardware brands, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of updated product catalogs and partner logos suggests ongoing operations. Strategic observations include the need for digital modernization and enhanced security to support business growth and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic with significant gaps. The website uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers and employs outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators beyond a basic privacy policy. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure practices are absent. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no evidence of a designated data protection officer or security framework adherence. The security culture is not evident from the website content. Business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential exposure to client data risks and reputational damage. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations should be addressed promptly.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries and plugins to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  4. Conduct a full security audit focusing on form input validation, HTTPS enforcement, and server security configurations.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daiļrade koks
Description
Retail and distribution of furniture fittings, tools, and related hardware products primarily targeting Latvian customers.
Key services
Sale of furniture fittings, Sale of tools, Product catalog and ordering online
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.5, jQuery UI 1.8.2, jQuery Cycle Plugin, jCarouselLite, Fancybox 1.3.4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • Login forms with password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  2. No visible social media links found.
  3. Login forms present but no visible multi-factor authentication or advanced security features.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. Partner logos indicate established supplier relationships.
  7. No visible SSL/TLS configuration details in HTML; assumed HTTPS from URL.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML head.
  9. Basic SEO meta tags present but no Open Graph or Twitter cards.
  10. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.5 and jQuery UI 1.8.2, which are outdated and pose security risks. The site uses common jQuery plugins like Fancybox and jCarouselLite for UI components. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile devices beyond basic CSS. SEO is minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are basic, and no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup are evident. Hosting provider and SSL/TLS configuration details are not available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dkveikals.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dkveikals.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.