Skip to main content

Security report for diversite-europe.eu

Pour la Solidarité · Non-profit · Belgium

Partial score · DNS & email only

66/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Observatoire européen de la Diversité' is a French-language platform operated by the non-profit organization Pour la Solidarité, based in Belgium. It serves as an information and strategic monitoring hub focused on diversity issues across Europe, targeting professionals, public decision-makers, and citizens. The platform offers news, events, publications, and resources related to social economy and diversity, positioning itself as a niche observatory with strong ties to European and regional institutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor, with integration of Google Analytics and social media channels, reflecting a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but no active consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diversite-europe.eu

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
66

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pour la Solidarité operates this observatory as part of its non-profit mission to promote social solidarity and diversity in Europe. The business model revolves around providing strategic information and resources rather than commercial services. The organization benefits from partnerships and support from the European Union and regional bodies, enhancing its credibility and reach. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on diversity and social economy, supported by curated events and publications. The target customers are professionals and policymakers interested in diversity issues. Growth indicators include regular event updates and active social media presence. The partnership ecosystem includes EU institutions and regional governments, reinforcing its authoritative position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager is standard but requires clear user consent mechanisms to align with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is acceptable for an informational non-profit site but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit policies, and consent management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and hosting a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pour la Solidarité
Registration number
RPM Bruxelles 0478-654-319
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pour la Solidarité
Description
Plateforme d’information et de veille stratégique sur la diversité en Europe, destinée aux professionnels, décideurs publics et citoyens.
Key services
Information dissemination, Strategic monitoring, Event organization, Publication of good practices and official documents
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics with consent implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a French-language European diversity observatory operated by Pour la Solidarité
  2. Content is rich with events, news, publications, and resources related to diversity and social economy
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  5. Includes social media integration and Google Analytics tracking
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond basic privacy and cookie notices
  7. No visible contact forms on homepage but contact info provided in footer
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and caching implied but no explicit performance metrics available. The site uses external resources from reputable domains and integrates social media effectively. Technical risks are low but include potential improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business goals well with room for modernization in security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diversite-europe.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diversite-europe.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.