Skip to main content

Security report for divasparkling.com

Divasparkling · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Divasparkling is a small retail beverage company specializing in sparkling drinks, including alcoholic and non-alcoholic varieties. The website targets adult consumers, implementing an age verification gate to comply with legal requirements for alcohol sales. The business operates primarily through e-commerce and distribution channels, with a consistent brand presence and a focus on flavored sparkling beverages. The company was founded in 2014, consistent with the domain registration date. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. The site is hosted by GoDaddy and shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, some accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in security headers and DNS security. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and enforces age verification, which are positive controls. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, and no certifications are displayed. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional and functional with moderate security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing clear terms of service and security policies would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching divasparkling.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Divasparkling occupies a niche in the retail beverage market, focusing on sparkling alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks with diverse flavors. Its business model combines direct e-commerce sales with distribution partnerships. The brand targets adult consumers who prefer flavored sparkling beverages. The company leverages social media channels on Facebook and Instagram for marketing and brand engagement. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding year, indicating a stable online presence. The absence of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests reliance on contact forms for customer interaction. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and an age gate is implemented to restrict access to adult content, which is critical for compliance in alcohol sales. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a security gap. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces tracking but appears managed with cookie consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear terms of service page to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer contact information for privacy concerns.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Divasparkling
Description
Divasparkling is a beverage brand offering a range of sparkling drinks including alcoholic and non-alcoholic options with various flavors such as Sparkling, Berry Fusion, Passion Fruit, Melon Fusion, Strawberry Mint, Piña Colada, and Non-Alcoholic variants.
Key services
Product sales, Distribution, Brand engagement via Diva Moments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Age verification gate for alcohol-related content
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and scripts.
  2. Age gate implemented for alcohol compliance.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; contact form available.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, managed via Google Tag Manager. The site uses a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, consistent with the WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with divasparkling.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review divasparkling.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.