Skip to main content

Security report for digiday.cz

DigiDay Czech s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DigiDay Czech s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in digital solutions including electronic notice boards, digital panels, LED screens, web projects, content creation, and corporate identity services. The company targets businesses, municipalities, and cities, positioning itself as a trusted provider of tailored digital products and services. Founded in 2020, DigiDay has established a solid market presence with over 830 satisfied clients and more than 1000 digital products deployed. Their business model includes sales and rental of digital hardware, creative studio services, and digital marketing solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service offerings and client testimonials enhancing credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of digiday.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digiday.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on B2B and B2G markets. Their competitive advantage lies in offering customized digital solutions with a strong emphasis on electronic official notice boards for municipalities. DigiDay leverages partnerships and maintains a creative studio to support branding and content needs. The presence of multiple product lines and service categories indicates diversified revenue streams. The company’s digital maturity is evidenced by a modern WordPress-based website with integrated marketing and analytics tools. Growth indicators include active client references and ongoing projects supported by regional funding. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding digital signage and interactive solutions in the Czech and Slovak markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced, integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate bot activity, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism via the Complianz plugin. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No visible security policy or incident response information is provided, which could impact transparency and readiness. The use of an external script from a less known domain (394424.com) warrants further review to ensure no security risks. Overall, the site follows best practices for privacy compliance but could enhance its security framework to better protect users and data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Review and validate all third-party scripts, especially those from less known domains, to mitigate potential security risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DigiDay Czech s.r.o.
Description
DigiDay je ryze česká firma, která propojuje inovace a kreativitu ve světě digitálních řešení, ať už jde o el. úřední desky, digitální panely, LED obrazovky, webové projekty, tvorbu obsahu nebo firemní identitu a pomáhá tak firmám růst a vyniknout na digitálním trhu.
Key services
prodej a pronájem elektronických úředních desek, prodej a pronájem digitálních panelů a kiosků, prodej a servis LED obrazovek, tvorba webových stránek, aplikací a obsahu, kreativní studio a tvorba firemní identity, videoprodukce
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Complianz GDPR plugin, Popup Maker
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin
  • Consent update logic for Google Analytics and marketing cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Strong focus on digital products for municipalities and businesses
  3. Good GDPR and cookie compliance with user consent management
  4. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS
  5. Presence of client testimonials and references enhances trust
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. Some external scripts from less known domain (394424.com) may require review
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap and Swiper.js for responsive design and interactive elements. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are employed for tracking and marketing analytics, with GDPR-compliant consent management via the Complianz plugin. The site loads moderately fast and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The hosting provider is Active24, consistent with the domain registrar information. Some technical debt is noted in the form of missing security headers and reliance on external scripts from less known sources. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional digital presence with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digiday.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digiday.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.