Skip to main content

Security report for difftravel.org

Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Difftravel.org is a Latvian small business specializing in accessible tourism services tailored for people with hearing, vision, or mobility impairments. The website offers group excursions with adapted vehicles and customized travel routes emphasizing Latvian cultural experiences. The business operates in a niche market with a focus on inclusivity and accessibility. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon CloudFront CDN and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but lacks visible security headers and advanced protections on login forms. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching difftravel.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized segment of the tourism industry focused on accessibility for disabled persons in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in curated travel routes and a database of accessible service providers. The business model is service-oriented, offering group and individual excursions with adapted transport. Revenue likely derives from tour bookings. The website content and social media channels indicate active engagement with the target audience. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business appears small and locally focused with growth potential in accessible tourism. Lack of detailed contact information and WHOIS transparency are minor concerns for credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. The login form is basic without visible CSRF tokens or multi-factor authentication options. No evidence of vulnerability scanning or incident response policies is found. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent or GDPR explicit statements beyond a basic privacy policy. No security certifications or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance.
  3. Enhance login form security by adding CSRF protection, rate limiting, and consider multi-factor authentication.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly available and accurate.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to build trust and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Tūrisms, kas pielāgots cilvēkiem ar dzirdes, redzes vai kustību traucējumiem, kā arī cilvēkiem ar apgrūtinātām pārvietošanās iespējam. Piedāvā ekskursijas nelielās grupās ar pielāgotiem transportlīdzekļiem, maršrutus cilvēkiem ar invaliditāti Latvijā.
Key services
Accessible group excursions, Customized travel routes for individuals with disabilities, Database of accessible service providers and locations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website targets a niche market of accessible tourism in Latvia.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  5. Privacy policy page exists but cookie consent is missing.
  6. Login form present but no advanced security features visible.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram confirmed.
  9. Site uses Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN for hosting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN for hosting and content delivery. JavaScript libraries include jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, and ResponsiveVideos, indicating a moderately modern but not cutting-edge tech stack. The site is mobile responsive and uses custom fonts and CSS for styling. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but no advanced features. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with difftravel.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review difftravel.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.