Skip to main content

Security report for didrihsonsarhitekti.lv

Didrihsons arhitekti · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Didrihsons arhitekti is a small architectural firm based in Latvia, showcasing a portfolio of residential, office, and mixed-use building projects primarily in Rīga and surrounding areas. The website serves as a professional portfolio to attract potential clients and collaborators. Technically, the site is built on the Berta CMS platform and uses JavaScript libraries such as MooTools and Video.js, with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager integrated for visitor tracking. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is limited, with no detected security headers or HTTPS verification in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to improve trust and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching didrihsonsarhitekti.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets clients seeking architectural design services, focusing on residential and commercial projects in Latvia. The business model is service-oriented, presenting completed and proposed projects to demonstrate expertise. The market position is niche and local, with no evidence of large-scale operations or subsidiaries. The website content quality is good, but branding consistency is moderate due to minimal business information and lack of trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may limit client engagement and trust. The firm could improve market presence by adding detailed business information, certifications, and clear contact channels.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers like Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from input vulnerabilities, but the lack of security best practices and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible privacy controls. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, limiting transparency. To improve, the firm should implement HTTPS, add security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response process and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Didrihsons arhitekti
Description
Architecture firm portfolio showcasing various architectural projects including residential buildings, office buildings, mixed-use buildings, and proposals primarily located in Rīga and nearby areas.
Key services
Architectural design, Building reconstruction, Project proposals
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, JavaScript, MooTools, Video.js, Picturefill, Milkbox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio for an architectural firm based in Latvia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  5. Uses Berta CMS platform with MooTools and other JS libraries.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No forms detected on the main projects page content.
  9. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  10. No explicit security or incident response information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Berta CMS platform with JavaScript libraries including MooTools, Video.js, and Picturefill for media handling. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site has a moderate loading performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS-specific security plugins or frameworks were detected. The absence of security headers and HTTPS verification suggests technical debt in security implementation. The site structure is clear with a portfolio focus, but modernization opportunities exist to improve performance, security, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with didrihsonsarhitekti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review didrihsonsarhitekti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.