Skip to main content

Security report for diat.lv

Diat · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diat is a well-established medium-sized company founded in 1994, specializing in ship repair, steel constructions, and related mechanical services primarily in the Baltic region. The company positions itself as a leader in its sector, offering a broad range of services including machining, surface renovation, spare parts production, and consulting. The website reflects a professional business-to-business model targeting industrial clients such as shipping companies and ports. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance and SEO optimizations, including multilingual support and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy-conscious analytics implementation, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-maintained, and provides comprehensive contact and business information, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diat.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Diat operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on ship repair and metal constructions. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence since 1994 and leadership in the Baltic states. The business model is B2B, serving industrial clients requiring specialized repair and machining services. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, equipment sales, and consulting. The company maintains physical offices in Latvia and Ukraine, indicating regional operational reach. The website's multilingual support and professional content suggest a focus on international clients. Partnerships include the developer grandem.lv. Growth indicators include recent news updates and service expansions. No direct competitors or parent/subsidiary relationships are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with granular user control, and anonymized IP tracking for analytics. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No security headers were detected in the HTML source, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site uses reputable third-party scripts but should regularly audit these for security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be elevated by publishing formal policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Diat Juras Servis”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diat
Description
Leader in Baltic states in ship repair works, metal construction production, internal and external surface renovation of various mechanisms and components from different sectors, mechanical machining and production of different mechanism and machine parts, equipment sales. Ship repair works are done when ship is standing in pier or during the voyage.
Key services
Ship repair, Steel constructions, Mechanical machining, Surface renovation, Equipment sales, Spare part producing, Pipeline cleaning, Engine repair, Ship repair management and consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery 3.7.1, Fancybox UI 4.0.27, WP Rocket (performance optimization), SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Grand Cookie (cookie consent management)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • IP anonymization for Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is complete with physical addresses and company emails.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Business is a medium-sized company founded in 1994 operating in ship repair and metal constructions.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to the business sector.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and Fancybox UI for UI enhancements. Performance optimizations are implemented via WP Rocket, including lazy loading and minification. Multilingual support is provided by WPML. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking with IP anonymization to respect privacy. The site uses Google Fonts for typography. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-optimized for performance and SEO. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. Technical risks include the lack of visible security headers and absence of explicit security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diat.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diat.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.