Skip to main content

Security report for diakonie-kreis-re.de

Diakonisches Werk im Kirchenkreis Recklinghausen · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diakonisches Werk im Kirchenkreis Recklinghausen is a large non-profit social service organization based in Germany, serving over 4500 clients daily with a broad range of care, counseling, and support services. The organization holds a significant regional market position as the third largest employer in the Recklinghausen district, focusing on vulnerable populations including elderly, families, people with disabilities, and those in need of social integration. Their website is powered by TYPO3 CMS and incorporates modern consent management via Usercentrics, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with clear navigation and comprehensive content about their services and engagement opportunities. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the organizational identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diakonie-kreis-re.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention diakonie-kreis-re.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for diakonie-kreis-re.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, providing social and healthcare services primarily in the Recklinghausen region. Their business model centers on community support, care provision, and social integration, with revenue likely derived from public funding, donations, and grants. The website highlights extensive service offerings including work and qualification programs, health and nursing care, family support, housing and participation, and counseling. They maintain partnerships with regional church bodies and Diakonie umbrella organizations, enhancing their ecosystem and credibility. The site also promotes employment and volunteer opportunities, indicating active community engagement and workforce development. Their digital presence supports transparency and outreach, positioning them as a key regional social service provider.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of a consent management platform (Usercentrics) to comply with privacy regulations. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP header security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The organization should consider publishing these policies and implementing additional security headers to enhance protection and trust. Overall, the site is secure for users and compliant with GDPR requirements, but could improve in formal security documentation and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and governance.
  2. Add explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Implement security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and consent management tools to maintain compliance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Diakonisches Werk im Kirchenkreis Recklinghausen
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diakonisches Werk im Kirchenkreis Recklinghausen
Description
Wir sorgen dafür, dass in unseren Einrichtungen und Diensten jeden Tag mehr als 4500 Menschen begleitet, beraten, gepflegt und unterstützt werden – oder eigenständig leben können.
Key services
Arbeit & Qualifizierung, Gesundheit & Pflege, Familie, Kinder & Frauen, Wohnen & Teilhabe, Beratung, Ehrenamt & Freiwilligendienst
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Usercentrics Consent Management, Splide.js slider, SVG icons
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professionally presented, and well-structured.
  3. Strong focus on social services and community support in the Recklinghausen region.
  4. Use of modern CMS (TYPO3) and consent management tools (Usercentrics).
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  6. Social media presence is active with official accounts linked.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. No visible email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled as contact in the HTML content.
  9. Contact forms are implied via navigation but no detailed form fields found in provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used open-source content management system, indicating a stable and maintainable platform. The use of Usercentrics for consent management shows attention to privacy compliance. The site uses modern front-end technologies including SVG icons and the Splide.js slider for interactive content. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features, supporting a positive user experience. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debts or risks were identified, though the hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements in security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diakonie-kreis-re.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diakonie-kreis-re.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.