Skip to main content

Security report for diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe is a well-established German non-profit humanitarian aid organization with over 70 years of experience supporting people affected by natural disasters, war, and displacement worldwide. The organization operates numerous projects globally, focusing on disaster relief, reconstruction, and preventive measures. Their website reflects a strong commitment to transparency, featuring recognized certifications such as the DZI-Spendensiegel and partnerships with reputable networks like Brot für die Welt and Act Alliance. The target audience includes donors, churches, NGOs, and the general public interested in humanitarian aid. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Sentry for error monitoring, and Usercentrics for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a professional user experience. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and clear navigation. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses consent management to comply with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the organization's identity, showing no privacy protection and reputable name servers, supporting the domain's legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a reliable platform for donors and stakeholders. Strategic improvements could include publishing detailed security policies and incident response information to enhance security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
42%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe holds a strong market position as a leading humanitarian aid organization in Germany, supported by a large network of partners and certifications. Their business model relies on donations and partnerships with churches and NGOs. The organization targets a broad audience including private donors, institutions, and communities affected by crises. Their extensive project portfolio and transparent reporting foster trust and donor confidence. The website's integration with recognized networks and certifications further strengthens their competitive advantage and credibility in the non-profit sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, consent management, and error monitoring via Sentry. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency in security governance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating good operational security. To advance security maturity, the organization should consider publishing formal security policies, incident response procedures, and a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and enhance stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers to include Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and others.
  5. Continue maintaining transparency and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe
Description
Wir unterstützen Menschen, die durch Naturkatastrophen, Krieg oder Vertreibung in Not geraten sind. Bitte helfen Sie mit Ihrer Spende!
Key services
Humanitarian aid projects worldwide, Disaster relief and reconstruction, Donation facilitation, Awareness and education on disaster topics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, Usercentrics CMP, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Sentry error monitoring with limited sampling
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
UTT
Tracking pixels
Sentry
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on transparency and trust with multiple certifications displayed.
  3. Comprehensive donation options and project information available.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact likely via forms.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, ensuring scalability and maintainability. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as Slick Carousel for UI components and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset loading and caching. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected, indicating good technical hygiene. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain uses reputable name servers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diakonie-katastrophenhilfe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.