Skip to main content

Security report for diag-mav-berlin.de

Diözesane Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Mitarbeitervertretungen im Erzbistum Berlin · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DiAG-MAV Berlin is a small non-profit organization serving employee representatives within the Archdiocese of Berlin. The website provides informational resources, legal documents, seminar announcements, and contact details tailored to its niche audience. The organization positions itself as a trusted source for employee representation in church-related contexts. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Revolution Slider, indicating a standard but functional digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes interactive maps for location display. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and basic form validation but lacks advanced security headers and visible incident response policies. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page in German. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security best practices and transparency regarding terms of service and incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching diag-mav-berlin.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention diag-mav-berlin.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for diag-mav-berlin.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on church employee representation. Its business model revolves around providing information, training, and legal support to employee representatives. The target audience is clearly defined as church employees and their representatives in Berlin. The website content and structure support this focus with detailed event listings, legal resources, and contact points. The lack of commercial elements and advertising suggests a mission-driven approach rather than revenue generation. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence and offers trust signals such as contact information and privacy compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and client-side form validation. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The presence of multiple jQuery versions could introduce vulnerabilities or conflicts. The login form does not visibly implement CSRF tokens, which could expose it to cross-site request forgery attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security headers, form protections, and incident response documentation are advised.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Consolidate jQuery library usage to a single, updated version to reduce conflicts and vulnerabilities.
  3. Add CSRF tokens or other anti-forgery mechanisms to all forms, especially login forms.
  4. Publish a clear incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure guidelines to enhance transparency.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing explicit terms of service and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Diözesane Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Mitarbeitervertretungen im Erzbistum Berlin
Description
DiAG-MAV Berlin is an organization providing information and support for employee representatives within the Archdiocese of Berlin. It offers resources, seminars, legal information, and event coordination for employee representatives.
Key services
Information provision, Seminars and training, Legal resources, Event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Revolution Slider, Leaflet.js, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure form validation (jquery.validate)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit organization site
  2. Content is in German and focused on church employee representation
  3. Includes login form for members with client-side validation
  4. Uses Google Maps and Leaflet for location display
  5. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  6. No visible social media links
  7. No explicit terms of service page found
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7, Revolution Slider, and WP Statistics. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. The site integrates Google Maps and Leaflet.js for location display. Performance is moderate with some potential overhead from multiple jQuery versions and slider scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and form validation but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical stack is standard for a small non-profit but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with diag-mav-berlin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review diag-mav-berlin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.