Skip to main content

Security report for detstvibeznasili.cz

Centrum LOCIKA, z. ú. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centrum LOCIKA operates the website detstvibeznasili.cz, a Czech non-profit platform dedicated to providing direct support to children and families affected by domestic violence. The site offers chat support, educational resources, and awareness campaigns targeting children, teenagers, parents, and school professionals. It holds a strong market position within the Czech Republic's child protection sector, leveraging professional content and consistent branding to build trust. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Fonts, and slick carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring user privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners, but lacks advanced security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with GDPR-aligned policies accessible. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is justified given the sensitive nature of the organization's work. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy practices, and vulnerability disclosure would further enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching detstvibeznasili.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization targets a niche but critical segment focused on child protection and domestic violence prevention in the Czech Republic. Its business model is non-profit, relying on public awareness campaigns, direct support services, and partnerships with related organizations. The presence of multiple active campaigns and social media channels indicates a well-established outreach and engagement strategy. The partnership ecosystem includes other child support and crisis centers, enhancing service coverage and credibility. Growth indicators include recent news updates and active campaigns. The organization maintains a professional web presence, supporting its mission and stakeholder engagement effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of third-party analytics and marketing pixels introduces moderate user tracking, which is partially mitigated by consent banners. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could benefit from enhanced controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  2. Enable IP anonymization in Google Analytics to improve user privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving privacy regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centrum LOCIKA, z. ú.
Description
Program Dětství bez násilí je bezplatná služba pro děti ohrožené domácím násilím s důrazem na spolupráci s celou rodinu.
Key services
Direct chat support for children, Support for parents, Educational resources for schools, Awareness campaigns
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Slick Carousel, CookieConsent.js
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with categories
  • Anonymize IP disabled in Google Analytics (potential privacy concern)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
TikTok Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on child protection and family support.
  3. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools with cookie consent mechanisms.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  6. No explicit or adult content present; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Webflow CMS, enabling rapid development and deployment with modern front-end technologies such as jQuery and slick carousel for interactive elements. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel. The site is hosted likely on Webflow's infrastructure, ensuring good performance and uptime. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and privacy features to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with detstvibeznasili.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review detstvibeznasili.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.