Skip to main content

Security report for dester.com

deSter · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

deSter is a well-established company specializing in innovative and sustainable food packaging and serviceware solutions primarily for the aviation and food service industries. With over 40 years of experience, the company positions itself as a leader in sustainable product innovation, supported by recognized certifications such as the EcoVadis Platinum rating. The website reflects a mature business with a professional design, clear navigation, and a focus on sustainability and market growth through an online shop targeting small and medium enterprises. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and employs modern analytics and cookie consent tools, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and enhancing security headers. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from adding privacy and security policy documents to improve compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dester.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on sustainable food packaging for aviation and foodservice markets. Its business model includes B2B sales and an expanding online shop for smaller quantity purchases, signaling growth and adaptation to market needs. The EcoVadis Platinum certification places deSter among the top sustainable companies, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website content and structure support a clear brand message focused on sustainability and innovation. The absence of explicit contact details on the homepage suggests contact information may be located on dedicated pages. The company appears to maintain a consistent branding strategy and leverages digital marketing and analytics tools effectively.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern CMS and plugins suggests regular updates, but explicit vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Ensure contact information including emails and phone numbers are clearly accessible to improve user support and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
deSter
Description
deSter is a leading provider of innovative food packaging and serviceware concepts to the aviation and food service industries. They combine over 40 years of industry experience with a passion for design and service trends to deliver bespoke, customer centric and impactful innovations.
Key services
Innovative food packaging, Serviceware concepts, Sustainable product development, Online sales for foodservice products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.21.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Piwik PRO analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the homepage HTML
  5. Professional design with clear navigation menus
  6. Sustainability and certifications prominently displayed
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and Elementor builder
  8. Tracking scripts from Piwik PRO and Google Tag Manager present
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses jQuery and includes scripts for analytics (Piwik PRO and Google Tag Manager) and cookie consent (OneTrust). The site loads a hosted background video and uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy/legal documents, which are areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website with room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dester.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dester.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.