Skip to main content

Security report for dessous.at

Dessesous.at - Das Magazin - Leibetseder KG · Retail · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

24/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dessous.at is an Austrian online magazine specializing in lingerie and fashion news, trends, and brand promotions. The site targets German-speaking audiences interested in lingerie and related fashion content. It operates on a WordPress CMS platform with a variety of plugins enhancing content delivery and user experience. The website demonstrates good content quality and professional design, with clear navigation and mobile optimization. However, the technical infrastructure shows weaknesses, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and missing DNS records, which impacts security and trust. The security posture is basic, with some security headers present but critical issues such as invalid SSL and lack of cookie consent. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy available but no cookie policy or consent mechanism. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires significant improvements in security and privacy to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dessous.at

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
24

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dessous.at, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dessous.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dessous.at positions itself as a niche media outlet in the lingerie retail and fashion sector, providing editorial content, trend reports, and shopping guides. The business model revolves around content monetization and brand partnerships, targeting fashion-conscious consumers. The company, Leibetseder KG, appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused market presence. The website's social media integration and structured data usage indicate a mature digital marketing approach. However, the lack of detailed WHOIS data and DNS records suggests possible use of proxy services or CDN, which may obscure some operational details. The site maintains a consistent brand image and offers a variety of content categories, supporting audience engagement and retention.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS and Referrer-Policy are set, the lack of DNSSEC, CAA records, and OCSP stapling further weakens domain security. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Forms on the site collect user credentials but lack visible advanced security measures. The site uses Matomo and Jetpack for analytics, which require careful configuration to ensure privacy compliance. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and implementation of comprehensive security policies are critical to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate misuse.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and privacy regulations.
  5. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for abuse and security issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a set of plugins including W3 Total Cache, td-composer, and Super RSS Reader, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The site uses jQuery 3.7.1 and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. Performance metrics are missing or zero, suggesting incomplete data collection or slow loading times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search visibility. Hosting details are unclear due to missing DNS A/AAAA records, possibly indicating proxy or CDN usage. The invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dessous.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dessous.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.