Skip to main content

Security report for denkanmich.ch

Stiftung Denk an mich · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stiftung Denk an mich is a Swiss non-profit organization dedicated to supporting people with disabilities by providing financial assistance for holidays and leisure activities. The foundation fills a social gap by enabling those who cannot afford recreational time to enjoy improved quality of life. The website reflects a focused mission with clear messaging, targeting individuals with disabilities and their supporters within Switzerland. The organization maintains a credible market position as a niche non-profit with recognized certifications such as ZEWO. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks including Vue.js and Nuxt.js, with integrations for analytics and media content. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a reliable digital presence for the foundation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching denkanmich.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates a donation-based business model, leveraging public and private contributions to fund its services. Its key services include financial support for leisure activities for disabled individuals, distribution of collection boxes, and processing funding requests. The target audience is primarily Swiss residents with disabilities and donors interested in social causes. The organization benefits from partnerships with certification bodies like ZEWO and media outlets such as SRF, enhancing its credibility and outreach. The website content and structure support clear communication of its mission and services, positioning it well within the non-profit sector. Growth potential lies in expanding donor engagement and digital outreach through social media and online campaigns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks is balanced with attention to secure coding practices. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits transparency in incident handling. There is no explicit incident response contact or security team information. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could improve by publishing security governance documents and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftung Denk an mich
Description
Die Stiftung Denk an mich unterstützt Menschen mit Behinderungen finanziell, um ihnen Ferien und Freizeitaktivitäten zu ermöglichen, die sie sich sonst nicht leisten können.
Key services
Finanzielle Unterstützung für Ferien und Freizeit, Bereitstellung von Sammelkässeli, Annahme von Gesuchen für Förderungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, YouTube Player API, Polyfill, Diffuser CDN
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded
  2. Clear focus on supporting people with disabilities in Switzerland
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. Social media presence supports trust and outreach
  5. No critical security issues detected
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, leveraging server-side rendering for performance. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and YouTube Player API for embedded media. The site loads multiple JavaScript modules asynchronously, indicating a modular and modern front-end architecture. The CMS appears custom but integrates well with the front-end. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially on mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with better ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the foundation's digital goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with denkanmich.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review denkanmich.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.