Skip to main content

Security report for deliverr.com

Flexport · Transportation · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flexport is a leading global supply chain logistics platform that integrates and coordinates logistics from factory to customer door. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including ocean freight, air freight, trucking, customs brokerage, eCommerce fulfillment, and more. With a strong market presence and over 10,000 clients, Flexport leverages technology to provide real-time visibility and control over shipments, enabling businesses to optimize their supply chains and grow efficiently. The website demonstrates a high level of digital maturity, utilizing modern frameworks like React and Gatsby, and integrating advanced mapping and tracking technologies such as Mapbox. However, the security posture is currently weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols, which are critical for protecting data in transit. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages, but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but should prioritize improving its SSL/TLS configuration to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deliverr.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flexport operates in the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on providing end-to-end logistics solutions for businesses of all sizes. Its business model centers on a platform approach, offering integrated services that cover freight forwarding, fulfillment, customs, and trade finance. The company targets businesses requiring efficient global supply chain management, emphasizing technology-driven visibility and control. Flexport's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service portfolio, advanced technology stack, and strong client base. The presence of numerous partner domains and extensive resource offerings indicates a robust ecosystem supporting its operations. The company appears to be large in size with a global footprint, supported by multiple international office locations. The website content is well-curated, reflecting a consistent brand image and strong market positioning.

Security posture

The website's security posture shows both strengths and weaknesses. Positive aspects include the presence of security headers such as SPF, DMARC, DKIM, and HSTS, and the absence of known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, and Logjam. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols significantly undermine the security of data transmission, exposing users to potential risks. Additionally, the absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption features indicates room for improvement in SSL/TLS performance and security. No explicit incident response or security policy information is found, which could be a gap in transparency. Overall, while some best practices are observed, critical improvements are needed to ensure robust security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable outdated ones to enhance security.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and reduce latency.
  4. Add a clear cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  5. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. It leverages Mapbox for interactive mapping and integrates Google Tag Manager and Ketch for analytics and marketing. The hosting infrastructure appears to be on AWS, as inferred from DNS nameservers. Despite the modern stack, the website suffers from slow load times (approx. 19 seconds) and a large page size (~3.4 MB), which could impact user experience and SEO. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are good, with proper meta tags and structured navigation. There is an opportunity to optimize performance by reducing resource count and page size. The technical debt is moderate, with clear paths for improvement in security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deliverr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deliverr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.