Skip to main content

Security report for deliveroo.es

Deliveroo · Transportation · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deliveroo is a well-established online food delivery platform founded in 2012, operating primarily in the United Kingdom with a strong international presence. The company connects consumers with local restaurants, supermarkets, and shops, offering fast delivery services through a network of riders. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies such as React and Next.js, and integrates comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, ensuring compliance with GDPR. The platform supports multiple user segments including consumers, restaurant partners, and delivery riders, with dedicated sections and calls to action for each. Security practices are robust, featuring HTTPS, security headers, and bot detection, although a dedicated security policy and incident response contact could enhance transparency. Overall, Deliveroo's website demonstrates high professionalism, strong branding consistency, and a trustworthy user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of deliveroo.es. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deliveroo.es

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
82
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention deliveroo.es, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,931
Employees
1
Customers
2,916
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for deliveroo.es.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –deliveroo.es2026-05-25

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Deliveroo holds a leading position in the UK food delivery market, leveraging a platform business model that facilitates transactions between consumers, restaurants, and delivery personnel. Its revenue streams include delivery fees, commissions from restaurant partners, and value-added services such as gift cards and corporate meal solutions. The company targets urban consumers seeking convenience and variety in food and grocery delivery. Strategic partnerships with well-known restaurant chains and a strong app presence support its competitive advantage. The ecosystem includes multiple related domains for corporate information, engineering, design, and student programs, indicating a diversified and mature operational structure.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of bot detection services like PerimeterX. Privacy compliance is well-managed through OneTrust consent management, reflecting adherence to GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy and incident response contact details represents an area for improvement. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and enhance trust with security researchers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention policies and user data handling to strengthen privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deliveroo
Description
Deliveroo is an online food delivery service that connects customers with local restaurants, takeaways, supermarkets, and shops, offering delivery in as little as 30 minutes.
Key services
Food delivery, Groceries delivery, Pharmacy delivery, Gift cards, Partnering with restaurants, Rider recruitment
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management, Polyfill.io, PerimeterX (bot detection)
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Content Security Policy
  • Cookie consent management
  • Bot detection via PerimeterX

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PerimeterX
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  3. Strong brand presence and clear business model.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  8. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via forms.
  9. Multiple external domains related to Deliveroo's international sites and services.
Technical notes

Notes

Deliveroo's website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, ensuring a positive user experience across devices. Integration with Google Tag Manager and OneTrust indicates mature analytics and privacy management capabilities. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but likely involve cloud infrastructure. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Opportunities exist to further modernize by enhancing security transparency and expanding technical documentation for users and partners.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deliveroo.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deliveroo.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.