Skip to main content

Security report for dekra-bilbesiktning.se

DEKRA Bilbesiktning · Transportation · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEKRA Bilbesiktning is a leading vehicle inspection service provider in Sweden and Europe, offering a wide range of inspection and testing services including battery tests for electric vehicles and registration inspections. The company leverages a robust digital infrastructure built on WordPress with modern optimization and analytics tools, ensuring a good user experience and SEO performance. Security measures include valid SSL certificates and essential security headers, though TLS protocols are outdated and could be improved. The website demonstrates compliance with GDPR through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and implements user consent mechanisms. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, indicating areas for enhancement. Overall, DEKRA Bilbesiktning maintains a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong market positioning in the transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dekra-bilbesiktning.se

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
15
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DEKRA Bilbesiktning operates primarily in the transportation sector, targeting vehicle owners in Sweden who require inspection and certification services. The business model focuses on service delivery with online booking capabilities, supported by a large network of 86 stations. The company benefits from being part of the DEKRA Group, a global leader in safety and inspection services. Their competitive advantage lies in extensive experience, a broad service portfolio, and digital accessibility. Partnerships with payment processors like Klarna and integration of analytics tools support operational efficiency and customer engagement. Growth indicators include expansion of new stations and introduction of innovative services such as electric vehicle battery testing.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with valid SSL certificates and implementation of key security headers to mitigate common web threats. However, the absence of modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and lack of DNSSEC and CAA records reduce the overall security posture. No public security policy or incident response plan is found, which could impact readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools is balanced with privacy considerations. To enhance security culture and trust, publishing a security.txt file and formalizing incident response information is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade SSL/TLS configuration to support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols for stronger encryption.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records to protect domain integrity and certificate issuance.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on nginx servers with DNS managed by Loopiagroup.com. It uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.1 with WP Rocket for performance optimization, jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality, and integrates Google Maps API for location services. Analytics are handled via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The site is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and lazy loading of scripts and images. Performance is fast with no reported resource loading issues. However, the SSL configuration lacks support for modern TLS versions, which is a technical risk. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical debt appears low, but modernization of security protocols is advised to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dekra-bilbesiktning.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dekra-bilbesiktning.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.