Skip to main content

Security report for deko.lv

Deko · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deko is a Latvian company specializing in wooden buildings and constructions such as summer houses, garden houses, saunas, warehouses, gazebos, carports, and garages. The website serves as a product catalog and service portal targeting the local Latvian market. The company appears to have been founded in 2021 and offers delivery and installation services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO, jQuery, and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-structured with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS in use and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is good with detailed cookie disclosures but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching deko.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Deko operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on wooden constructions. Its business model revolves around showcasing a wide product catalog and providing related services such as delivery and installation. The company targets homeowners and property developers in Latvia seeking quality wooden structures. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a positive market position locally. Integration with major analytics and marketing platforms indicates a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement. Lack of explicit contact details and corporate information on the website suggests room for improvement in business transparency.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. However, no HTTP security headers were detected in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file and contact channels for security incidents reduces readiness for vulnerability disclosure and incident management. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces tracking but is disclosed transparently. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adding security headers, incident response information, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages linked from the homepage.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide explicit company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deko
Description
Koka būves un konstrukcijas - vasarnīcas, dārza mājas, pirtis, noliktavas, lapenes, nojumes, garāžas, auto nojumes un vēl daudz kas cits.
Key services
vasarnīcas, dārza mājas, pirtis, noliktavas, lapenes, nojumes, garāžas, auto nojumes, piegāde, montāža
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.5.1, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found or linked.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and jQuery.
  6. Google Tag Manager and multiple tracking services are integrated.
  7. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. Content is in Latvian language and targets local Latvian market.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.5.1, and uses Swiper.js for sliders. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with detailed categories and descriptions. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and includes multiple external scripts from trusted domains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present. No hosting provider or server details were found. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with deko.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review deko.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.