Skip to main content

Security report for decars.lv

DEcars · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DEcars is a small automotive detailing and repair service provider based in Jelgava, Latvia. The company offers a range of services including anti-corrosion treatment, welding, headlight polishing, ozone cleaning of car interiors, and engine washing. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and provides multiple contact channels including phone, email, and social media links. The business targets local vehicle owners seeking quality automotive care. Technically, the website uses modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking important security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy for its business scope but could improve security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching decars.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector focusing on automotive detailing and repair services. Its business model revolves around providing specialized vehicle care services with an emphasis on quality materials and customer satisfaction. The website supports online booking, indicating a digital engagement strategy. The company appears to be a small local player with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The partnership with the design agency divizion.agency is evident. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests opportunities for growth in trust and compliance. The business targets local customers in Jelgava and surrounding areas, positioning itself as a reliable service provider in a niche market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent implementation. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The online booking form collects personal data with consent but does not show anti-CSRF protections. No incident response or security contact information is published, which limits transparency and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add anti-CSRF tokens and input validation to all forms collecting personal data.
  4. Obtain and publish incident response and security contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data query issues to enable full domain legitimacy verification.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DEcars
Description
DEcars is a detailing and automotive service company based in Jelgava, Latvia, offering services such as anti-corrosion treatment, welding, headlight polishing, ozone cleaning of car interiors, and engine washing.
Key services
Anti-corrosion treatment (Mercasol), Auto welding works, Headlight polishing, Car interior ozone cleaning, Engine washing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery 1.11.2, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, Moment.js, Daterangepicker, Bootstrap Select, Animate.css, Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (links use https)
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  3. Website provides clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address in Jelgava, Latvia.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with user agreement mechanism.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found or linked.
  6. Website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks but lacks visible security headers.
  7. Business is a small local automotive detailing and repair service provider.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic jQuery and UI libraries.
  9. No evidence of security or incident response policies published.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 4.1.3, jQuery 1.11.2, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, and other UI libraries. It is mobile responsive and provides a good user experience with smooth navigation and interactive elements. Performance is moderate, with external CDN usage for libraries which aids loading speed. However, the site lacks a detected CMS or backend technology information. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating minimal data collection. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and trustworthiness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with decars.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review decars.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.