Skip to main content

Security report for debigbv.nl

De Big BV · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

De Big BV is a small Dutch company specializing in property clearance and professional cleaning services after death or in cases of heavily cluttered or contaminated homes. The company targets individuals and families in the Rotterdam area who require assistance with these sensitive and demanding tasks. Their business model focuses on providing relief to families by handling difficult cleaning and clearance tasks professionally. The website content is basic but relevant, providing clear descriptions of services and contact options. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries and is hosted via Strato with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a reasonable level of technical infrastructure but with room for modernization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and DNSSEC but lacks explicit security headers and updated libraries, which could pose risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and terms of service pages, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its scale but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching debigbv.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on niche services related to property clearance and cleaning after death. Market positioning is local and small scale, with a focus on personal and sensitive service delivery. The business leverages direct contact methods including phone, email, and a contact form to engage customers. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company is newly founded in 2023, consistent with the domain registration date. Revenue streams likely come from service fees for clearance and cleaning. The website does not indicate advanced marketing or analytics tools, suggesting a straightforward operational model. The presence of DNSSEC and active domain status are positive trust signals. However, lack of privacy and security policies may limit trust for more privacy-conscious customers.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and DNSSEC, which are strong foundational security measures. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.7 and Prototype 1.7.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in preparedness. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but privacy policy absence is a compliance risk. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information to improve security readiness and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
De Big BV
Registration number
90258959
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
De Big BV
Description
Woningontruimingen en professionele schoonmaak na overlijden. De Big BV biedt diensten aan voor het ontruimen van woningen die vol staan met spullen of ernstig vervuild zijn, en verzorgt professionele schoonmaak na overlijden om familieleden te ontlasten.
Key services
Woningontruimingen, Schoonmaak na overlijden
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7, Prototype 1.7.3, jQuery UI 1.8, cm4all widgets, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
strato-editor.com pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local service provider for property clearance and cleaning after death.
  2. Content is minimal but relevant and functional.
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with user control over third-party content.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  6. Technical stack uses older JavaScript libraries which may pose security risks.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies.
  9. No certifications or trust badges displayed.
  10. Website design and content quality is basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the cm4all platform hosted by Strato, utilizing older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7 and Prototype 1.7.3, which are outdated and may pose security risks. The site includes standard UI components like jQuery UI 1.8 and Font Awesome for icons. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data. The site uses a cookie consent widget with user controls for third-party content. Hosting is via Strato with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS setup. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS beyond cm4all. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with debigbv.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review debigbv.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.