Skip to main content

Security report for dealdone.online

SCR Technologies · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dealdone is a technology company offering a secure digital platform for creating and managing verbal agreements online. Their service targets individuals and small businesses who require a simple yet secure way to formalize deals such as loans, rentals, sales, and work contracts. The platform emphasizes encryption, biometric protection, and ease of use, supported by a freemium subscription model with clear pricing tiers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, optimized for mobile devices and SEO, but shows some backend PHP warnings that should be addressed. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and encryption claims, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Contact information is limited to emails, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dealdone.online. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dealdone.online

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dealdone occupies a niche market in secure digital agreements, leveraging encryption and biometric security to differentiate from traditional contract management tools. Their freemium business model with Premium and Enterprise subscriptions targets both individual users and small teams. The company appears to have partnerships or funding links with European regional development entities, enhancing credibility. The website content and subscription details suggest a focus on user-friendly, secure, and legally sound digital deal-making. Growth potential exists in expanding business user base and enhancing security features. The lack of phone contact and physical address may limit trust for some users. The visible PHP warnings indicate some technical debt that could impact user experience if not resolved.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and claims end-to-end encryption and biometric protection within its app, which are strong security indicators. However, the presence of PHP warnings in the HTML source reveals backend code issues that could expose sensitive information or lead to vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in backend code hygiene, security headers, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Fix all PHP warnings and errors to prevent information leakage and improve backend stability.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SCR Technologies
Description
Dealdone provides a secure digital platform for creating, storing, and managing verbal agreements and deals online. It targets individuals and businesses who want to formalize agreements such as loans, rentals, sales, work contracts, and cost-sharing with encryption and biometric protection.
Key services
Secure digital deal creation, Encrypted storage of agreements, Audio recording and attachments, Push notifications for deadlines, Subscription plans for unlimited deals
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Poppins), Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • End-to-end encryption claimed
  • Biometric and PIN protection for app

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on secure digital agreements with encryption and biometric security
  3. Some PHP warnings/errors visible in HTML source indicating backend code issues
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance
  5. Contact information limited to emails, no phone or physical address found
  6. Subscription plans clearly described with pricing
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML source
  9. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and proper meta tags
  10. Mobile optimized with responsive design and Bootstrap framework
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. However, visible PHP warnings indicate backend code issues that should be addressed to avoid security risks and improve performance. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small tech business but requires backend code fixes and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dealdone.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dealdone.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.