Skip to main content

Security report for dcul.eu

Dobrovolnické centrum, z.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dobrovolnické centrum, z.s. is a Czech non-profit organization with a 25-year history dedicated to connecting volunteers with those in need across various social sectors. The organization operates volunteer programs supporting children, youth, seniors, and disabled persons, and maintains international partnerships to foster volunteering in Europe. Their key services include mentoring programs, youth clubs, and cultural initiatives, positioning them as a trusted regional non-profit with accreditation in sports and cultural volunteering. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and good mobile optimization, hosted by WEDOS Internet, a.s. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though lacking security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, indicating areas for compliance improvement. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, with clear contact information and active social media presence.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dcul.eu

This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dcul.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dcul.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as an established non-profit volunteer center with international reach. Their business model focuses on community engagement and volunteer coordination rather than commercial revenue. The target audience includes volunteers, families, youth, and social organizations. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional content, supporting credibility. Partnerships include external platforms for volunteer signups, enhancing operational efficiency. Growth indicators include active social media and ongoing project development. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially impacting GDPR adherence. The security culture appears basic but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and incident contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dobrovolnické centrum, z.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dobrovolnické centrum, z.s.
Description
Non-profit organization with 25 years of history, networking across public sectors, connecting those in need with volunteers. Engages international volunteers and partners to develop volunteering in Europe. Supports children, youth, seniors, disabled persons, and others needing volunteer help. Accredited volunteer center in sports, culture, and extraordinary events. Established youth club ENTER22 and cultural club for people from Ukraine in Ústí nad Labem.
Key services
Volunteer programs, Mentoring programs, Youth club ENTER22, Cultural club for Ukrainians, Support for families with children
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Gutenberg blocks, Carousel Block plugin, Advanced Iframe plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit volunteer center with 25 years history.
  2. Content is in Czech language with clear focus on volunteering and community support.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with emails, phone, and physical address.
  5. No forms detected on homepage; external signup link provided for volunteers.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and YouTube.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and good mobile optimization.
  8. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.8.3 with Gutenberg blocks and plugins such as Carousel Block and Advanced Iframe, indicating a modern CMS infrastructure. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a.s., a reputable Czech provider. The site loads moderately fast with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking services, which aligns with privacy-conscious practices but limits marketing insights. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features, which should be addressed to reduce potential operational and reputational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dcul.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dcul.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.