Skip to main content

Security report for dcc.at

Doppelmayr Group · Transportation · Austria

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Doppelmayr Group website for the Automated People Mover system presents a business focused on transportation solutions, specifically cable liner automated people movers designed to manage high visitor flows efficiently. The company appears to be a large, established entity in the transportation sector based in Austria, with a consistent brand presence and clear business focus. The website content is basic but includes well-structured SEO metadata and social sharing tags, indicating some digital marketing maturity. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and WordPress CMS, hosted behind Cloudflare CDN. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS severely undermine the security posture. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the presence of many prefetch and preload scripts suggests an attempt at optimization, though the lack of HTTPS is a critical flaw. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. Security analysis reveals significant vulnerabilities: no SSL/TLS encryption, no HSTS, no DMARC, DNSSEC, or CAA records, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies. Tracking and advertising scripts are present without accompanying privacy or cookie policies, indicating poor privacy compliance. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the website's risk profile is elevated due to missing HTTPS and privacy compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in security infrastructure, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dcc.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Doppelmayr Group operates in the transportation sector, specializing in automated people mover systems branded as Cable Liner®. Their market position is that of an established large company with a focus on infrastructure solutions for high visitor flow environments. The business model centers on manufacturing and supplying these transport systems to commercial and public entities. The target audience includes businesses and organizations requiring efficient people mover solutions. The company leverages a partner ecosystem evident from multiple linked domains related to marketing and analytics but no direct partner or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not directly visible from the website content. The website's digital presence is professional but lacks comprehensive business contact details and privacy transparency.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The site implements some basic security headers like X-Content-Type-Options and X-XSS-Protection but lacks advanced headers such as Content Security Policy. No DMARC or DNSSEC records are configured, increasing risk of domain spoofing or phishing. The lack of privacy and cookie policies despite extensive tracking scripts indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated as no security contact channels are provided. Overall, the security culture appears immature and requires urgent remediation to protect business and user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements and display consent mechanisms.
  3. Add and configure advanced security headers including Content Security Policy, Referrer-Policy, and Feature-Policy.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts and policies to improve transparency.
  5. Enable DNS security features such as DMARC, DNSSEC, and CAA records to protect domain integrity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a Nuxt.js frontend framework, indicating a modern JavaScript-driven architecture. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and security benefits, though these are undermined by lack of HTTPS. The site uses multiple external scripts for analytics, marketing, and advertising, including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok, and Snapchat integrations. Performance data is missing, but the presence of many preloads and prefetches suggests attempts at optimization. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are basic but functional. The absence of SSL and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical debt and security risk. Modernization efforts should prioritize secure transport and privacy compliance to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dcc.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dcc.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.